The Vinyl Analysis

That plastic you’re recycling may be on its way to a landfill

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Next to John Travolta, no career comeback has been more surprising than that of plastic. Back in the ’80s, plastic was considered the environmental villain of the material world. But today’s consumers feel good about choosing products made with plastic because they think most plastic is being recycled. Nothing illustrates this change of heart better than shoppers’ responses to the “paper or plastic” question: In 1996, four out of five people chose plastic, as compared to one out of six in 1984.

What Americans may not realize, though, is that the plastic industry has merely recycled its image. The American Plastics Council (APC)—which represents “virgin” plastic producers—spends close to $20 million per year on advertising campaigns exalting plastic’s benefits (such as the recent “Plastics Make It Possible” TV ad, in which a little girl floats heavenward on the handles of a plastic bag).

And a few blemishes have been concealed in the media makeover: The plastic industry is second only to the chemical industry in its generation of ozone-depleting substances; some of the chemicals and metals in plastic can cause health problems (see this issue’s Theo Colborn interview); and despite the industry’s claim that close to 80 percent of Americans have access to a plastic recycling program, most plastic ends up in landfills.

A recent Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) study shows that less than 10 percent of plastic packaging was recycled in 1996. According to APC spokeswoman Susan Moore, some of the blame lies with consumers who “have gotten a little lackadaisical about recycling.” But others point the finger right back at manufacturers, saying they have done little to create a market for recycled plastic. Two-thirds of the national recycling companies that used to recycle plastic have stopped doing so. And many cities have been forced to drop plastic from their recycling programs, saying it’s not economically viable.

Meanwhile, the production of new plastic is on the rise. According to the EDF, in the last eight years manufacturers have produced 13 times more virgin plastic packaging than has been recycled. And of the half-dozen types of consumer plastic currently in use in this country, only two are recycled in large quantities by most communities—and those mostly end up in products such as lumber, clothing, and carpeting, all of which are not recyclable.

The industry claims that packagers need several different kinds of plastic for different applications. However, while shampoos are still bottled using four different kinds of plastic, other industries have made efforts to standardize their packaging. Some have even encouraged companies to redesign with recyclability in mind. For example, the paper industry has suggested using labels made with water-soluble adhesives in order to make paper products, such as envelopes, easier to recycle.

“That’s the kind of thing that’s not happening in the plastics industry,” says Richard Denison, an Environmental Defense Fund scientist.

“Some recyclers don’t believe that the virgin plastic producers support recyclers,” says Robin Cotchan of the Association of Post-Consumer Plastics Recyclers. Others say the only thing that could save plastic recycling is government regulation. But the plastic industry actively lobbies against state legislation requiring post-consumer recycled content in new packaging.

Even if the plastic industry isn’t “making it possible,” you can still help: Contact your local recycling program and find out exactly what they recycle; after you buy products in recyclable containers, don’t forget to actually schlepp them out to the curb or drop-off zone; consider reusing plastic containers; stay away from single-serve packaging and try to buy in bulk; if you’re really feeling frisky, call companies and tell them you want to see recycled content in their packaging; and, finally, when the next PR blitz hits, don’t believe the hype.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate