Counting on Your Friends

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Lobbyists for USA*Engage have a tougher job than most corporate hired guns. That’s because just about every member of Congress will invariably favor sanctions against at least one country on the planet, if only as a cheap and easy way of demonstrating his or her concern for human rights.

Hence, The Wexler Group has been pressed to come up with especially powerful tools of persuasion to get sanctions reform approved by Congress. The strategy its lobbyists settled on, which is laid out in the following memo, matched up companies in the corporate coalition with members of Congress with whom they were thought to have great sway. The pairings were clearly made after careful study and were based on criteria such as geography, past campaign contributions, and historical friendships. They’ve met with limited success: Of the 60 singled out in the memo, only 12 have signed on. Among the notables:

  • Chevron was given the task of recruiting Rep. William Jefferson (D-La.), who proved to be an easy mark. He signed on as a co-sponsor last November 4. Chevron has major operations in Louisiana and has received strong support from Jefferson in the past. He is, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, one of only two members of the Congressional Black Caucus who has opposed sanctions on the ruling military dictatorship in Nigeria—where Chevron has huge investments. Chevron made a $1,000 contribution to Jefferson four days prior to his decision to co-sponsor the Sanctions Reform Bill.

  • Boeing was charged with lining up support from Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.). The aerospace giant has a plant in the congressman’s district and he’s been eager to help the company out in the past, especially in supporting more trade with China, where Boeing makes enormous profits. After Blumenauer co-sponsored USA*Engage’s sanctions reform bill, Boeing, which had already contributed $1,000 to Blumenauer earlier in the year, tossed in another $500. Blumenauer’s chief of staff, Bob Crane, confirms that Elizabeth Schwartz, a Boeing lobbyist, asked to talk to the congressman about the sanctions reform bill. No meeting was held because, according to Crane, he had already signed on as a co-sponsor.

  • Rep. David Dreier (R-Calif.) proved a harder nut to crack, but he finally signed on as a sanctions reform bill co-sponsor on March 19. Lockheed-Martin, the company charged with twisting his arm, has big operations in California, and during the 1995 to 1996 campaign cycle gave Dreier $4,000, making it one of his largest contributors.

  • The Wexler Group selected ARCO to win over Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska). Young is one of ARCO’s best friends in Congress. For years, he fought to lift a decades-old ban on the export of North Slope crude oil and to open up exploration at Alaska’s huge National Petroleum Reserve. But thus far Young has held out.

    The Memo

    Back to “Doing Business With Despots
  • WE'LL BE BLUNT

    It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

    The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

    Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

    The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

    Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

    And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

    Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

    If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

    payment methods

    WE'LL BE BLUNT

    It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

    The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

    Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

    The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

    Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

    And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

    Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

    If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

    payment methods

    We Recommend

    Latest

    Sign up for our free newsletter

    Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

    Get our award-winning magazine

    Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

    Subscribe

    Support our journalism

    Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

    Donate