Hollow Endorsement

Sometimes political endorsements seem a bit awkward. Maybe that’s because sometimes they don’t exist.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


There’s a new bill floating around Congress. The Farm and Ranch Habitat Protection Act, proposed by Rep. Tom Campbell (R-Calif.), would amend the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to allow for “accidental and incidental killings of endangered species.” The bill seems to open up a loophole in the ESA; what’s “incidental” to some is crucial to others. But then again, maybe the bill is reasonable: In a letter to his House colleagues, Campbell even touted the support of the National Audubon Society.

Why would the Audubon Society, an organization that “advocates the stringent enforcement of the Endangered Species Act,” endorse such a bill? Good question—particularly because the Audubon Society had never even heard of the bill, let alone supported it.

Campbell was caught red-handed when Audubon found out he was falsely listing their organization, as well as the Planning and Conservation League, as supporters of his bill in an April 20th letter addressed to fellow Congress members.

Responding to Campbell on April 30, Audubon vice president Daniel Beard set the record straight: “Until we have the opportunity to fully examine your legislation and determine whether it would provide a net benefit to listed species on the national level, we can not, and do not, endorse your bill.”

Given that the Audubon Society didn’t endorse his proposed bill, you’d think Campbell would promptly remove their name from the list of supporters. Nope. Campbell’s revised letter still named Audubon as supporters—despite their continued protest—until finally a third version was sent out which at last omitted mention of the Society altogether.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate