Next Year’s Model

Imagining consumer-driven genetics

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The path leading to commercial eugenics will be paved with good inventions. Contemporary gene research focuses on admirable quests to cure diseases and defects, but how these advances will be applied may alter both our DNA and our definition of defect. For instance, in the ’80s, both Genentech and Eli Lilly received patents for a genetically engineered growth hormone intended to treat the more than 50,000 people with dwarfism in the U.S. Today, the hormone is one of the most frequently prescribed gene therapies available, and both firms have mounted an aggressive PR campaign to redefine normal shortness as an “illness.” Disease, it seems, is in the eye of the patent holder.

Cultural biases have often led to differences being labeled “defects,” and while we’ve come a long way since southpaws were burned at the stake, we want medicine to make us more than healthy; we want it to make us perfect. And when cosmetic medicine meets genetic manipulation, the results—for those who can afford them—could be far from superficial.

Color Me Nordic

She’ll be blond. Blond is the most popular hair dye in the U.S.; even kids show the same preferences: The flaxen-haired original Barbie outsells racially and ethnically diverse dolls. Eye color will suggest an equally chilly heritage (blue is the No. 1 colored contact lens color). She won’t need prescription contacts, and save for the occasional fashion accoutrement, specs won’t be necessary.

Structurally Sound

Her facial structure will probably conform to what anthropologists say the standard of beauty is for women in most cultures: large prominent eyes, wide cheekbones, big lips, and a tapered jawline. The male ideal, on the other hand, requires a square jaw and chin, and a powerful brow (think Superman).

On the Button

She’ll have a pert nose. Social critic Camille Paglia recently wrote that she hoped “the wonderful, strong, sharp nose of ‘The X-Files’ star Gillian Anderson will become a new plastic-surgery model for American girls, with their tedious Sandra Dee button-nose fetish.” Fat chance. Short and perky is still the choice among the 46,000 American women who had their noses bobbed in 1996.

illustration of a blonde woman

All Men Are Created Equilateral

Her features will be balanced. The off-kilter angularity of supermodel Christy Turlington aside, research shows that those we find attractive have strong facial symmetry. True, parents-to-be are unlikely to be won over by the research that suggests that even-featured people have more sex partners. But expectant couples hardly need a doctor to tell them that attractive (i.e., symmetrical) people are more likely to earn more money and be better liked.

The Last Days of the Wonderbra

She’ll be well-endowed. With nearly 122,000 women a year getting breast implants, the market for an “all natural” bust can only grow. The Cambridge, Mass.-based company Reprogenesis plans to create whole breasts out of a woman’s own breast cells. Ostensibly, this will benefit women who undergo mastectomies (103,000 a year), but CEO James McNab told the Dallas Morning News he was hoping for a market closer to 250,000 a year.

The Other Hand

She may be ambidextrous. Some theorize that left-handed people have readier access to the creative side of their brain (note the artistry of such lefties as Presidents Reagan, Bush, and Clinton, as well as Leonardo da Vinci and Jim Carrey). But they’ve also been labeled “defective,” and they’ve been regularly punished by makers of school desks, airline seats, and scissors. Given the choice, will parents give their children an easy right or a hard left?

It’s as Easy as ABC

She’ll be smart. In 1996, Americans spent $40 billion on supplemental “consumer education,” proving that parents are already willing to shell out plenty in order to upgrade their own and their children’s aptitude. Who can doubt that they will seize the opportunity to enhance intelligence in utero?

The Belle Curve

She’ll be shapely. Gene cosmetologists may have to tailor their female-fashioning slightly for different markets, but an hourglass figure is universally admired. Based on studies of males from Africa, the Azores, Hong Kong, India, the Netherlands, and the U.S., psychologist Devendra Singh found that while the women men considered attractive might vary in size from Anna Nicole Smith to Twiggy, all had waists considerably narrower than their hips.

Legs Up to Here

She’ll have slender thighs. Only a plastic surgery lobby could bemoan the genetic elimination of most women’s “problem area.” Liposuction is the most widely performed cosmetic surgery procedure, with 149,000 people sucked and tucked in 1997.

Pretty Is as Pretty Does

She’ll be nice. Some research indicates that the genetic trait that makes people more impulsive might also make them more prone to commit violent crimes. Expectant parents might alter an embryo’s DNA in order to steer their kid straight. Staying straight is another story: Few dispute that homosexuality is at least partly inherited, but the tangle of factors that determine sexual orientation has most experts admitting that no single gene turns gayness “on.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate