Sailing Out

<I>The Nation</I> invites you and your favorite columnists on a fun-filled Caribbean fundraising cruise (please ignore the environmental violations and underpaid workers).

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


It is ever the lot of progressives to struggle against the tide, so who would begrudge them a well-earned break? Certainly not The Nation. The left-leaning, champion-of-the-working-man weekly magazine is reserving spots for about 200 of those “who know, care about, respect, support, publish, write, and read” its pages to join its famed contributors in December on a weeklong Caribbean cruise aboard the M.S. Veendam.

An invitational letter describes the Veendam, run by the Holland America Line, as “a ‘one-class’ ship (of course!).” Which class? Nation passengers will drop between $1,800 and $4,600 each for the vacation.

Unfortunately, the Veendam’s mostly Indonesian and Filipino crew will see little of this money. Ruud Touwen, the Netherlands coordinator for the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF), says “[Holland America] is one of the companies that makes the most profit and pays the worst of all cruise lines to its crew.” According to the Indonesian seamen’s union, Indonesian crew members aboard the Veendam average about $435 per month in wages (approximately $2.47 an hour for a 44-hour workweek), far below the ITF-recommended $1,200 per month. With overtime, which crew members almost always work, pay averages $728 per month.

To be fair, as union members, Holland America crews enjoy collective-bargaining rights. But low pay is not the only black spot on the company’s record. In June Holland America pleaded guilty to two felony counts of discharging oily bilge from one of its cruise liners off the coast of Alaska, agreeing to pay a $2 million fine, the second largest ever levied against a cruise line for an environmental crime.

Is there an irony in the prospect of The Nation hammering out a progressive agenda on the deck of a potential ecohazard while underpaid, overworked seamen toil below? We asked some of the cruise-goers:

Victor Navasky, the publisher, dismisses criticism, saying the prime objective of the cruise is to reduce the magazine’s six-figure deficit. “Progressive organizations shouldn’t be disqualified from paying their bills,” he says, adding that in the past, less glamorous fundraisers had failed to draw as much interest. Cruise tickets, by contrast, are selling fast.
“Beat the Devil” columnist Alexander Cockburn says that he is going with a double objective: To treat his girlfriend to a vacation and to enlist new readers to “a far superior publication”—CounterPunch, the muckraking newsletter he co-edits. As for the irony, he notes, “You don’t have to go far to find contradictions on the left,” adding that Mother Jones harbors a few as well.
Molly Ivins, contributing editor, says she is amazed that anyone would want to go along at all. “This isn’t what the left does. We should be going to Haiti to build houses.” But, she says, a trip to Haiti probably wouldn’t do much for The Nation‘s deficit.
“Minority Report” columnist Christopher Hitchens anticipates vigorous poolside polemics, waving off charges of “champagne socialism” as “sneers that belong on the small-minded right.”
“Republic Opinion” columnist Eric Alterman had no comment on the cruise’s irony, saying only that the mark of success will be if it makes “lots of money for Victor.” This, however, will not be his first jaunt on a luxury liner. Last year The Nation sent him to cover a cruise organized by the conservative National Review. Noting the attentive service that surrounded the passengers’ every movement, he wrote in the October 6, 1997, issue: “The great thing about being a right-winger, so far as I can tell, is that you get to exploit people and feel good about it. Any self-respecting liberal would feel guilty being so well served by so many apparent Third Worlders.”

Bon voyage!

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate