November/December 1998 Issue

Pentagon Promotion

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


For a Pentagon employee, nothing could ensure a lucrative post-government career more than a stint with the Defense Security Assistance Agency (DSAA), which administers the Foreign Military Sales program. The DSAA receives a 3 percent commission on the defense equipment it sells to foreign countries, which creates, according to a 1991 report from Congress’ Office of Technology Assessment, “a powerful incentive for DSAA personnel to make as many sales as possible.” (In 1992, Congress placed a yearly cap on these commissions.)

A review of DSAA’s last 10 directors shows that nine went to work for arms makers or defense industry consulting firms after leaving the agency (six for firms that sell weapons or services overseas).

Lt. Gen. George Seignious (1971-1972) became chairman of GRC International Inc., a defense and national security consulting firm.

Vice Adm. Ray Peet (1972-1974) became vice president for international affairs for Teledyne Ryan.

Lt. Gen. Howard Fish (1974-1978) went to Lockheed and served on a Pentagon advisory committee that gives confidential advice to the secretary of defense on overseas sales. He also worked for Loral and LTV, and headed the American League for Exports and Security Assistance, which lobbies Congress for foreign sales.

Lt. Gen. Ernest Graves (1978-1981), a military analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, never went to work full time for the defense industry. “I just wasn’t comfortable with the notion of trading commercially on relationships I had formed when I was working for the government,” he says.

Erich von Marbod (1981-1982) was hired by Fish to work for LTV.

Lt. Gen. James Ahmann (1982) became a vice president at BDM, which owns Vinnell, a consulting firm that trains the Saudi Arabian National Guard, a praetorian guard for the royal family.

Lt. Gen. Philip Gast (1982-1987) became vice president for international operations at Burdeshaw Associates, which represents defense contractors seeking overseas contracts.

Lt. Gen. Charles Brown (1987-1990) worked for Military Professional Resources Inc., a firm that trains foreign armies and facilitates sales of U.S. military equipment.

Lt. Gen. Teddy Allen (1990-1993) took a consulting job at Hughes the day after he left DSAA.

Lt. Gen. Thomas Rhame (1993-1997) presided over DSAA when the agency expanded sales to former Eastern bloc countries. Now he’s a vice president at the Association of the United States Army lobbying group, which, Rhame says, is heavily funded by the defense industry.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate