Peace, Love, and Martial Law

The latest reincarnation of the legendary Woodstock is being held at a military base, and the troops already have been called in to keep the peace. Have fun, kids.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In 1969, the 500,000 folks who made their way down to Yasgur’s farm to crash Woodstock found a spontaneous community of fellow travelers who managed three days of harmony and joy free of serious violence, despite rotten weather, a crumbling stage, and some really nasty brown acid.

There will be none of that nonsense at Woodstock ’99.

The three-day concert, at which 40 bands will play for several hundred thousand fans paying $150 each, is being held at a former military base in Rome, New York. Manning the multiple fences and guard towers along the six-mile perimeter of the base will be hundreds New York state troopers, Department of Defense personnel, and North East Air Defense (NEAD) National Guardsmen.

Woodstock ’99 promoters picked the baddest security coordinators they could find, from the toughest American cities with the nastiest police departments. Ken Donohue, a former New York City police chief, and Dan Flynn, former Dade County (Miami) police chief, have been put in charge of maintaining order at the event. They will oversee a total security force of 3,100. Besides patrolling the perimeter, guards will be patrolling the site in search of miscreants in possession of illegal contraband.

The list of items the hundreds of thousands of concert goers (who will be camping, mind you) may not bring to the event includes:

  • Pots and pans, lanterns, stoves or grills
  • Alcoholic beverages
  • Illegal drugs or paraphernalia
  • Weapons, firearms
  • Metal objects: knives, axes, hatchets, shovels or tent stakes
  • Glass or metal cans, bottles, containers
  • Fireworks or incendiary devices
  • Hazardous materials, including fuels of any kind
  • Video cameras
  • Tape recorders
  • Umbrellas
  • Air horns
  • Lawn furniture
  • Pets (except for seeing-eye dogs and the like)
  • (Bringing children is not officially illegal, but they are strongly discouraged.)

In hopes of preventing any frivolity before it gets started, event promoters have posted a tough-talking interview with security chief Donahue on their official Web site. Here is an excerpt:

Q: What’s the deal with all this talk about gatecrashing?

A: It’s not going to happen and anyone who thinks they can get into Woodstock without a ticket is in for a very rude awakening.”

Q: Well, a lot of people out there seem to think they’re going to get in without a ticket.

A: “Well, a lot of people are wrong.”

Q: You sound pretty confident.

A: “I am.”

Q: Why?

A: “People seem to think that this concert site is just some big field, but this is not ’94 or ’69. We’re talking about a former military base. This place was built to be defended against a full military attack. I think it can keep out a few attempts at gatecrashing.”

Q: O.K., what will happen if someone does try to jump the fences?

A: “Well, after I kick their ass … (laughs) actually, we’ll catch them and they’ll be arrested and charged with trespassing. We have a holding cell on site that can detain over 200 people and we’ll have district attorneys and judges on-site 24 hours a day to process any charges. Not to mention, parts of the site are federal property — which means you run the risk of federal prosecution if you try to sneak in. I don’t know about you, but $150.00 is a bargain to see over 40 bands — I can’t even imagine who would risk going to jail to save a few bucks.”

Was that a gauntlet I just heard drop? While Woodstock has somehow morphed from hippie love-fest into a prison-camp, perhaps the only thing that hasn’t changed in the past 30 years is that there are still a lot of young people out there willing to do just about anything to see a free concert.

Donahue concluded the interview with this touching insight: “We want to protect the ticket-holders and make sure they aren’t cheated out of their investment, and we want to make sure that everyone has the most fun possible.”

Yippee.

Stay tuned to the MoJo Wire for up-to-the minute news and strangeness from inside the razor-wire fences of Woodstock ’99 July 23-25.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate