Criminal Procedure (continued)

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In March, lawyers representing some 600 female prisoners at the state’s only all-female prison, the Washington Corrections Center for Women (WCCW), returned to court to seek continued federal oversight of inmate health issues. The American Civil Liberties Union of Washington, Columbia Legal Services, and the Northwest Women’s Law Center argue that the state has not lived up to the terms of the Hallett vs. Payne judgment, which required prisons to improve the prison’s quality of care for the WCCW’s 743 female prisoners.

In a written response, prison media representative Patricia Wachtel strongly disagrees. “We feel we have met the stipulations and judgments and in many cases have exceeded the requirements in setting up an adequate system, employing quality staff, and addressing problems as they arise.”

According to Aaron Caplan, staff attorney of the Washington chapter of the ACLU, particular attention in this case has been focused on two areas — the WCCW’s dental care (provided by the aforementioned Dr. Yank) and mental health care system. Patricia Arthur, project director of the Institutions Project of Columbia Legal Services in Seattle, says the mental health system has even deeper problems, including inadequate staffing, neglect of patients in crises, and violent or degrading treatment of mentally ill women.

Women housed in the mental health ward of WCCW — many of whom suffer from severe depression and psychotic disorders — are in desperate need of consistent care by licensed mental health care professionals, Arthur says. The prison insists that all inmates have access to mental health care 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

By neglecting the prisoners’ serious psychiatric counseling needs, Arthur argues the prison has witnessed a sharp increase in serious suicide attempts and incidents of self-mutilation (also known as cutting). WCCW representatives neither confirm nor deny this increase, saying only, “statistics that show an increase in numbers of self-harm or suicide attempts can be deceiving.”

To make matters worse, prisoners with mental illness are allegedly punished for hurting themselves. “[Infractions] can result in being placed in segregation, loss of ‘good time,’ [or] loss of job,” says Arthur. The prison’s policy is completely understandable, counters WCCW’s Wachtel, as infractions are a way of keeping a formal record of inmate behavior.

In transcripts of court proceedings, witnesses describe the treatment they received after admitting to feeling suicidal or committing acts of self-harm. Justine O’Neill, a 29-year-old prisoner, suffers from bipolar disorder and from post-traumatic stress disorder. In December 1998, she cut herself with a razor blade. According to O’Neill’s testimony, she never received counseling for the incident, but was punished with a loss of 10 days from her good-conduct time. Allissa McCune, a 39-year-old prisoner housed in the mental health ward for severe psychiatric problems including multipersonality disorder and panic and anxiety disorder, cut the brachial artery in her upper arm in a suicide attempt. After recovering from surgery, she was given extra hours of work duty, placed in a one-on-one watch in a small room, and fined $50 for medical expenses.


previous   next

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate