Feds leave ill uranium workers in the dust

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


You may remember the Paducah, Kentucky nuclear weapons plant that recently made headlines. The U.S. Department of Energy plans to compensate plant workers there who are suffering from cancer and other radiation illnesses. However, The NASHVILLE TENNESSEEAN reports that workers in the similar Oak Ridge, Tennessee plant are disappointed they are not getting similar attention.

It was recently disclosed that workers in both plants were not told that the uranium they worked with also contained plutonium, which is potently radioactive. Many workers at and neighbors of nuclear weapons sites in the area have been diagnosed with unexplained neurological, respiratory, and immune disorders. One resident of Paducah said, “Every household around the plant has a different story.”

To bring attention to health problems at the Oak Ridge plant and seek fair treatment and compensation, the president of a support group for ill workers and neighbors is leading a trip to Washington to state the workers’ case.

The Oak Ridge workers are not the first group in the U.S. to fight for government compensation for occupational exposure to uranium. Navajo uranium miners who worked under extremely unsafe conditions during the Cold War received some compensation in recent years for radiation-related deaths and illnesses.

http://www.tennessean.com…

KS

_
Public school gives up Christian textbooks

Sept. 16

The principal of Belridge (Calif.) Elementary School, Robert Wentland, announced Wednesday that he would ship all the school’s Christian textbooks back to the publisher, according to the ASSOCIATED PRESS. Combining Christian ideology with different subjects, the books informed students that only Christians go to heaven and Native Americans “attained a degree of civilization” but “had no knowledge of the true God, and without this knowledge all other attainments are worthless.”

Wentland held public meetings this summer about the books, and all parents were shown textbook samples and signed consent forms. He returned the materials, however, after the ACLU filed a lawsuit on behalf of a retired minister and a woman who had pulled her daughter out of the school. Nevertheless, Wentland said, “The state of California would be hard-pressed to find books as good.”

http://wire.ap.org…

KS

_
Kids buy slaves, fuel demand

Sept. 15

It was a heartwarming story — the kind of good news today’s media eat up: Children in a Colorado elementary school were so upset last year when they learned that Sudanese children were being sold into slavery, they raised enough money (in conjunction with the American Anti-Slavery Group and Christian Solidarity International) to free more than 1,000 of them, at a price of about $50 per slave. Now the fifth-graders want to do it again this year, and they’ve inspired hundreds of copycat bake-sale movements elsewhere in the country.

Problem is, the more slaves these kids and their well-meaning benefactors buy, the better the market becomes for slave-traders in Sudan and elsewhere in Africa, as the CONSERVATIVE NEWS NETWORK has correctly pointed out. So rather than ending slavery, these apple-cheeked kids are actually fueling its growth by increasing demand.

Now, after having been informed of this unfortunate and unintended consequence by UNICEF, the kids’ teacher has refused to call off the program, saying she will leave it up to the kids to decide whether to continue buying slaves, according to the DENVER POST. Let’s hope fifth grade isn’t too young for a lesson in macroeconomics, because it seems their teacher is too old for a lesson in common sense.

http://www.denverpost.com…

BSB

_
Report: Free trade threatens forests

Sept. 14

INTER PRESS SERVICE (IPS) reports that environmental groups fear that the world’s forests may be on the “chopping block” at the upcoming meeting of the World Trade Organization (WTO). On the agenda is discussion of a global free-logging agreement being proposed by the United States. The proposal calls for a reduction in tariffs worldwide in wood and paper products.

A coalition of over 100 environmental groups, most of them based in the Pacific Northwest, has issued a 32 page report which claims that reduced tariffs will undermine each individual nation’s ability to protect its forests, and increase worldwide consumption of forest products overall.

The report also cites a number of cases in which the interests of free trade and environmental protection clash. For example, WTO regulations could prevent countries from blocking importation of lumber infested with foreign insects that pose a danger to indigenous forests.

http://www.oneworld.org…

J.B.

_
Judge says GM hid evidence

Sept. 13

THE ATLANTA JOURNAL-CONSTITUTION reports that a Fulton County Judge has accused General Motors and its legal team of defrauding the court and obstructing justice. The Judge slammed the car manufacturer and its lawyers for suppressing key evidence which showed that GM chose to ignore safety problems with the fuel tank used in certain models. The evidence in question? Attorney’s notes taken during interviews with GM engineer Edward Ivey about a crash safety report he wrote 26 years ago.

“Plaintiffs have exposed a shameful scheme by GM to defraud and mislead several courts, to thwart and obstruct justice and to enjoy the ill-gotten gains of likely perjury,” wrote the judge in his ruling, which ordered GM to produce the controversial notes within five days.

In an interesting subplot, one of the lawyers who may be implicated by the documents is none other than Kenneth Starr, who, before taking a job as an independent counsel, defended GM in product liability lawsuits. While Jim Butler, the plaintiff’s counsel in this wrongful death civil suit, has explicitly accused Starr of being involved in wrongdoing, the judge’s order did not mention Starr. However, in what the JOURNAL-CONSTITUTION called an “unusual motion,” last week GM lawyers asked the court to forbid Butler from mentioning Starr during the upcoming trial.

In February of last year, the MoJo Wire broke the story that Starr may have obstructed justice while defending GM against lawsuits. This latest ruling may bring GM and its lawyers, including Starr, one step closer to prosecution for supressing information about Ivey’s report.

http://www.accessatlanta.com/…

J.B.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate