Kosovo war good for arms trade

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


This just in: War is good for business if you’re a arms manufacturer. But the business is not just booming because the US has to restock its arsenal.

THE BOSTON GLOBE reports that US arms makers may wind up seeing a windfall from unexpected sources resulting from the bombing of Yugoslavia earlier this year. Recently published statistics show that the NATO campaign was highly dependent upon superior US military technology. The disparity in quality between the US and European militaries has prompted European NATO partners to seek an upgrade in their arsenals. At a meeting last week in Toronto, NATO officials agreed to 58 initiatives aimed at closing that technology gap.

According to the GLOBE, these initiatives, if properly funded, could translate into big business for US arms makers. In addition to increased sales to the NATO countries of Europe, the bombing campaign is also being used as an effective tool for marketing US-made arms to customers all around the world. The GLOBE predicts increased sales for “smart” bombs made by Boeing and Raytheon, jet engines made by General Electric, and laser guidance equipment from Lockheed Martin.

http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/273/business/…

JB

_
In Scotland,sometimes rape is OK

Sept. 30

Just months after the outcry over rapes at Woodstock, researchers on the other side of the Atlantic uncovered more bad news on the sexual violence front. A study by Scotland’s Zero Tolerance Charitable Trust found that fully half of the young men surveyed thought forcing a woman to have sex was sometimes acceptable, reported the BBC. A third of women aged 14 to 21 felt the same way.

One researcher said she had not predicted such a widespread acceptance of rape, saying, “We didn’t set out to find such a result so we were shocked by it.” Reasons both men and women chose as justifying rape ranged from being in a long-term relationship to having slept around. That’s not surprising in itself; kids hear those cultural messages every day. It’s the sheer numbers that are shocking: 50 percent of 14-to-21-year-old Scottish men shows a lot of justification for the unjustifiable. The number of young women buying into the rape-is-OK reasoning is equally disturbing.

There’s one thing Woodstock and Glasgow have in common: They’re both strong evidence that media messages of women-as-victims don’t go unheard.

For more resources on violence against women, check out the American Bar Association’s Domestic Violence Homepage.

http://news2.thls.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/scotland/newsid_456000/456845.stm

KS

_
That’s imaginary cancer, Junior

Sept. 29

According to the ENVIRONMENTAL NEWS SERVICE (ENS), 103 children in Dover Township, New Jersey are suffering from cancer, making it the nation’s largest “cancer cluster.” State investigators have found evidence of extensive toxic contamination of the local drinking water. However, despite compelling circumstantial evidence, no government study has definitively linked the high rate of cancer in Dover’s children to contaminated groundwater.

Cancer clusters have been getting increasing attention of late. In 1997, President Clinton issues an executive order requiring federal agencies to make identifying environmental health risks to children a “high priority.” Last year, the story of Woburn, Mass. — a small town where 21 children contracted leukemia — was portrayed in a popular film called “A Civil Action,” starring John Travolta.

Nevertheless, according to the ENS, state and federal investigators still claim that in no case have groundwater contaminants been linked to a cancer cluster. In fact, they say a legitimate child cancer cluster has never been proven to exist in the United States.

Check out this excellent, in depth article for more information on the issue.

http://ens.lycos.com/ens/sep99/1999L-09-27-01.html

JB

_
Get thee to a fact-checker

Sept. 28

On Sept. 19, ABC ran an hour-long special called “Is America # One?” which compared the economies of India, the US, and Hong Kong in an attempt to prove the successes of American-style free-market capitalism. The show featured ABC correspondent John Stossel (never one to let objectivity get in the way of reporting) interviewing economists, waxing philosophical about health care, and comparing poverty in the first and third worlds. Not everyone was happy with the show’s conclusions, however. FAIRNESS AND ACCURACY IN REPORTING (FAIR) issued a highly critical assessment of the show this week, saying, “The program was filled with so many factual inaccuracies … and unsubstantiated claims that it calls into question whether ABC News applied any sort of journalistic standards to the broadcast.” The FAIR release gives contact information and encourages people to voice their opinions directly to the network and the reporter.

Among Stossel’s claims: Poor Americans don’t usually suffer from a lack of access to heath care. He said, “the truth is that when someone is denied [health] care, it makes headlines because it’s so unusual. Most of the time, even the poorest person going to the emergency room gets the same … treatment” as wealthy people. After asking people lined up at a food pantry in the South Bronx if they owned VCRs and microwaves, he issued this touching dispatch: “These people … aren’t here because they’ve been going without food. They come because the food is free.”

http://www.fair.org/activism/stossel-america.html

jr

_
School of Americas still in business

Sept. 27

Last July, the House voted 230 to 197 to cut $2 million in funding for the US Army-run School of the Americas in Fort Benning, Georgia. Last week, however, a House conference committee voted 8-7 to restore the funds, which are used to cover the costs of bringing soldiers from Latin America to the US for training. Over its 53-year history, the School of the Americas has graduated more than “57,000 officers, cadets, noncommissioned officers, and government civilians from 22 Latin American countries” and the US, according to the school’s own Web site. As reported in the LEDGER-ENQUIRER (Colombus, Ga.), SOA spokesman Nicholas Britto said, “We feel that finally the American people, through Congress, have decided that the school is needed.” (In an unfortunate oversight, Britto did not explain how a vote by 15 people, which nullified the will of more than 400 elected officials, represents democracy at work, but we’ll take his word for it.)

Not everyone is happy with the decision, however. Critics — like Washington DC-based SOA Watch — say that the school’s graduates “have been responsible for some of the worst human rights abuses in Latin America,” funded and endorsed by the US when it suited national objectives. Calls to shut down the SOA intensified after graduates from the school were implicated in the 1989 murders of six Jesuit priests and two women in El Salvador.

http://www.l-e-o.com/news/0923soacopy.htm

jr

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate