Straddle This

As George W. moves ever closer to the middle, Durst wonders what campaign issues might possibly be left for the candidates to disagree on.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Well, looky here. It turns out George W. Bush may actually be smarter than a bucket of moss-covered rocks. Well, brighter than your average shrub, or at least clever enough to figure out compassionate conservatives don’t pay for rich people’s pork by skipping across the scalps of the poor with mountain-climbing cleats. When the Republican Congress first floated the idea of stalling earned income tax credits, the idea was every right-thinking GOPer would fall in line with the same practiced goose step they’ve perfected since Newt Gingrich first trained his revolutionary army in the black surgical budget arts. Of course every GOPer since then has lost the presidency.

Sending the party leaders a wake up call loud enough to annoy Pete Townsend, Georgie must have decided the nomination was already sewn up, so it was time to position himself for the general election, which definitely means butt splinters o’ plenty from fence straddling. And definitely not treating the middle class like stepping stones on the way to Capital Gains Reduction Valhalla.

A far-thinking Republican. Who’da thunk? Maybe the guy really is Reagan redux. Maybe he will reshape the Republican Party into the party of the little guy. A party with its focus on the future rather than the next quarterly dividend. A party that cares about carbon units instead of corporate interests. Of working families instead of special interests.

Yeah, right. You got a better chance of Pat Robertson sponsoring a needle exchange program in Havana. Or Don Knotts playing Rhett Butler in the next Gone With The Wind sequel. Or finding a factory-installed CD player in a ’54 Studebaker Commander. You get the picture.

Every political consultant worth his tasseled loafers these days has learned the secret of positioning the candidate so close to the middle, I’m constantly surprised their ads don’t feature double yellow lines down the center of their foreheads. Clinton was the first Democrat to learn it. The Republicans had “Family Values,” Bill came up with “Families First.” Gore learned his tricks from the same trough, you watch. It’ll turn out he too is pro-good/anti-bad. Who knew?

Bush’s battlefield conversion is but the beginning. In the next 13 months we’re guaranteed to see more cloaking devices than a Romulan fleet. Smokescreens designed to make David Copperfield more envious than photos of Claudia Schiffer lapdancing with Cindy Crawford.

Projected onto the candidates malleable features will be holographic recreations of all the great American heroes; Teddy Roosevelt, Harry S Truman, Harriet Tubman … all right, admittedly, a line will be drawn. And the speeches. Oh, the speeches. The ones that will pinpoint them within a hint of a whisper of a shadow of hazy. Here’s a few of the crucial convictions we can expect to become privy to:

  • Crime is bad and there’s too much of it. What we need is less crime.

  • My opponent would rather raise taxes than pet his dog. As a matter of fact he doesn’t even own a dog.

  • I come from a family, I have a family, I think families are grand.

  • Campaign finance reform is crucial, but not as crucial as jobs.

  • We are more like we are now than we have ever been before and it is because of us.

  • We are more like we are now than we have ever been before but it is not our fault.

  • Schools are very important but prisons are more very important.

  • Public transportation is a wonderful thing and other people should be encouraged to use it.

  • What government needs today is more people like you, and I am one of you.

  • We must sweep away the debris of yesterday and build on the solid foundation of tomorrow.

    Will Durst believes the future is yet to come. Durst Case Scenario appears weekly on the MoJo Wire.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate