Voice of America literally transmits toxic waste

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The federally funded Voice of America (VOA) radio network is supposed to send the good word about the USA into the ears of listeners around the world — but in Sri Lanka, the local VOA station has reportedly been sending out toxic waste that has leaked poisons into a local water supply. ENVIRONMENT NEWS SERVICE reports that villagers in northwestern Sri Lanka are protesting waste disposal by a nearby VOA relay station, which they blame for a spate of mysterious deaths of domestic animals and cattle.

The waste in question was spawned by a fire in November 1996, while the relay station was still under construction. VOA hired an American company to get rid of the charred transmission equipment and other debris, which contracted with the area’s chief Buddhist priest to bury the junk in pits on the local temple grounds. Last month, dogs and cattle who drank from a nearby pond suddenly started dying. Understandably alarmed, village residents had samples from the pits tested; they were found to contain small quantities of half-a-dozen hazardous chemicals.

A VOA official insists that the buried detritus “is not harmful to people, animals or the environment.” The villagers’ dogs and cows had no comment.

http://ens.lycos.com/ens/nov99/1999L-11-10-01.html

VB

_
Death by corporation in Buffalo

Nov. 11

Cynthia Wiggins, 17, was on her way to work in Buffalo’s Walden Galleria mall in December 1995, when the bus she was riding let her off on the side of a seven-lane highway. A dump truck hit her as she tried to run across, reports the BUFFALO NEWS. She died three weeks later.

It was a tragic accident, but the location of the bus stop was no mistake. The mall’s owners had forbidden her Route 6 bus from entering the parking lot. They didn’t want people from her inner-city, mostly black neighborhood hanging out at the tony Galleria. According to the owner of a shoe store in the Galleria mall at the time, the son of a top mall executive once said, “We don’t want black shoppers in this ‘Rodeo Drive’ … You’ll never see any inner-city bus near or on mall property.”

Wiggins’ family sued the mall in a wrongful-death lawsuit that began Monday. By all accounts, they have an uphill battle in the courtroom. The mall’s owners claim Cynthia’s death was her own fault, because, they claim, she should have left her house earlier and waited at a suburban transfer point to a bus that would have been allowed into the parking lot. Moreover, the jury in the Wiggins case has no African-American on it (Wiggins was black). The population of Buffalo itself is about a third African-American.

http://www1.buffnews.com/editorial/19991108/1025994.htm

KS

_
Drug companies: No bad news!

Nov. 10

An investigation recently published in the JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION has reached the shocking conclusion that studies funded by drug manufacturers are nearly always full of good news. According to the article, which analyzed 20 studies funded by drug manufactures and 24 funded by non-profit groups, only 5 percent of the company-sponsored studies reached negative conclusions. In contrast, nearly 40 percent of the non-profit studies, which were analyzing the same six new cancer treatments, reached negative conclusions. Of the company researchers, 30 percent were found to put a positive spin on their own negative or neutral data.

While the investigation was unable to document specific instances of bias, it suggested some possible reasons for the wide disparity between studies funded by the manufacturer of a drug, and those conducted by independent, non-profit sponsored investigators. They found that companies tend to discontinue funding for studies which show disappointing results early on. An additional obstacle are medical journals, which were found to have a general bias toward publishing studies with positive results. “Regardless of funding source, studies with unfavorable preliminary evidence are less likely to be completed, less likely to be submitted for peer review, and, once submitted, less likely to be published.” Finally, the authors suggest that company researchers may have an “unconscious bias” due to their dependence on companies for funding and travel perks, as well as a personal financial stake (i.e. they own stock) in the success of a particular drug in the marketplace.

http://jama.ama-assn.org/issues/…

JB

_
The few, the proud … the convicts

Nov. 9

Facing an acute manpower shortage, the British army is trying just about everything to lure new recruits into service. Having already waged a campaign to sign up homeless people, the army is now turning to the prison system to try and recruit young criminal offenders.

The rationale behind admitting prisoners into the army? It seems that convicts are about the only people left in Britain who might find military service appealing. Thanks in large part to a healthy economy, and a general distaste for the unceasing nature of contemporary military operations, ordinary civilians just aren’t interested in putting their lives at risk in combat anymore.

“We have lost the appetitle for killing,” said Christopher Coker of the London School of Economics. “We have certainly lost a cause for which we would be prepared to die.”

http://www.newsunlimited.co.uk …

JG

_
Guatemala may get killer president

Nov. 8

Ahead in the voting in Guatemala’s presidential elections, Alfonso Portillo stands to become an appropriate, if frighteningly familiar figurehead for a political party which has a ignominous, genocidal history.

Portillo has admitted to a double murder (he says it was in self-defense) which occurred 17 years ago, and has stopped just short of bragging about the accomplishment in his campaign, according to the WASHINGTON POST. Portillo represents the Guatemalan Republican Front (FRG), the party which is headed by Efrain Rios Montt, who helped with the military crackdown which led 36 years of bloodshead. As many as 200,000 were killed or “disappeared” in the civil war which theoretically ended in 1996. The US government was complicit in that coup and the resulting brutality, according to recently declassified government documents.

http://washingtonpost.com/…

BSB

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate