MoJo Must Reads

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


_
Global warming swallows island

Feb. 18, 2000

While scientists continue to wrangle over whether or not global warming is a reality, the inhabitants of Tuvalu — a tiny island nation in the South Pacific — think that the skeptics are all wet. Meteorologists are predicting that a good portion of the country will be under water this weekend due to record high tides caused by global warming.

As the globe heats up, the polar ice caps melt and the ocean expands, so sea-level rises. Though spring flooding is an annual occurrence in Tuvalu, the AGENCE FRANCE PRESSE reports that the tides have been getting progressively higher for the past several years. The highest point on the country’s main island, which has 11,000 inhabitants, is 15 feet. This weekend’s record tide is predicted to crest at 11 feet. Looks like that’s gonna be one crowded speed bump.

Read the AGENCE FRANCE PRESSE story here.

JB

_
FAIR on flirting

Feb. 17, 2000

Are women smashing corporate glass ceilings with coy comments and strategically displayed body parts? Media watchdog group FAIR (FAIRNESS AND ACCURACY IN REPORTING) slams the Wall Street Journal for saying so. A recent page-one Journal article says today’s typical young businesswoman is using everything she can to get ahead — including “unabashed flirting” — to the detriment of her male colleagues’ careers. FAIR reminds readers that women still make just 75 cents on the male dollar, and female CEOs represent just three of the Fortune 500 companies. The article, says FAIR, “implies young women are succeeding not based on their intelligence but on their willingness to exploit their sexuality — even when there is no evidence for this claim.”

Read the FAIR story here.

KS

_
Just say no guests

Feb. 16, 2000

Now you can be evicted from public housing not only for bad behavior, but for your friends’ behavior. A federal appeals court reversed a lower court decision and upheld a Housing and Urban Development policy which allows tenants to be evicted from public housing for drug use by their visitors on or near the premises, even if the tenant doesn’t know about it.

REUTERS reports that in the test case, four elderly tenants face eviction by the Oakland Housing Authority for drug use by family members or, in one case, the caretaker of a 75-year old disabled tenant. Lighting up or snorting didn’t even have to take place in the apartment to qualify: The daughter of one tenant allegedly had cocaine three blocks away.

Read the REUTERS story here.

PS

_
Gas guzzlers: Good for you?

Feb. 15, 2000

Those who think they’re helping the environment by scrapping their old gas guzzler for a new fuel-efficient Volkswagen may want to think twice, the NEW SCIENTIST reports. New cars tend to produce more carbon dioxide — a greenhouse gas — than do older models, according to a new study by Utrecht University in the Netherlands.

Many countries have introduced tax incentives and other policies to encourage people to get rid of their old cars and replace them with more efficient modern cars. Environmentalists believe newer cars reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. But what they have not considered , according to researchers, is that new cars are heavier and more powerful than older ones. Also, common assumptions about switching to newer cars fail to account for the emissions resulting from scrapping or even recycling old cars and from producing new ones.

Read the NEW SCIENTIST story here.

JG

_
Fetal victims’ rights

Feb. 14, 2000

If Colorado passes a bill currently under debate, assaulting a pregnant woman could become two crimes in one: an assault against the mother, and a second, separate assault against the fetus.

The CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR reports that Colorado is just one of a growing list of states moving to increase legal protection for fetuses, a trend that has abortion rights’ advocates worried. Supporters say their aim is to protect pregnant women, and to acknowledge and punish the loss when violence causes fetal injury or miscarriage. But by assigning explicit legal rights to a fetus, the bill opens a door that pro-choicers would rather keep closed.

Read the CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR story here.

PS

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate