With Friends Like These …

In which our man Durst watches Pat Robertson explode in Bush’s face, and John McCain alienate everyone except the Democrats.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Friends are the lifeblood of politics. They keep a campaign’s circulation and — most importantly — its cash flowing. Phil Gramm says a politician’s best friend is money: Then again, Phil Gramm is about as cuddly as a pit bull caught in barbed wire. But it is the company you keep that helps plot the public coordinates that define you. Which is probably why nobody hangs with David Duke anymore, and Pat Buchanan is avoided like oysters dripping green ooze in July.

There are problems with friends, though. For example, they may have the table manners of rutting boars. Or you may have to tamp down their enthusiasm when they press too hard in your favor. For instance, they might say that whoever doesn’t agree with you is nothing but a large-mouthed slime lizard destined to spend eternity in hell, sucking potato seeds off the treads of farmers’ boots.

Take Pat Robertson. Please. Specifically, his taped phone calls on behalf of George W. Bush, where he calls McCain’s national chairman, Warren Rudman, “a vicious bigot who wrote [that] conservative Christians are anti-abortion zealots, homophobes, and would-be censors.” Which, minus the vicious bigot part, I don’t have a problem with, because mostly it’s true.

I’m sure Robertson means that such a characterization is a bad thing, though. He’s just pissed because his presidential shot in 1988 floated like a garbage scow shoved off a cliff. He must be feeling a little less-than, especially since the Christian Coalition lost its tax-exempt status last year and this is his last-ditch effort to be a Big Time Player by having Bush beholden to him. Although it seemed for a while that McCain might gain the most from Robertson’s proxy work.

McCain, however, has his own problems. One of them is with analogies. First he gets in big trouble for calling Bush’s truth twisting capabilities “Clintonesque.” Then he likens party freako units on the right — Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell — to party freako units on the left — Al Sharpton and Louis Farrakhan — which caused all hell to break loose. I’m sorry, all heck to break loose.

Either way, it helped in Virginia and Washington about as much as a bicycle seat on a baseball bat. North Dakota doesn’t count. Sorry North Dakotans. I’m sure this is not news. Glad you had a caucus and all, but really, who cares? What was it, three delegates? Nothing personal. It’s just business.

Another of McCain’s problems is that the man is ostensibly trying to win the Republican nomination for president even though Republicans don’t seem to like him very much. Democrats and independents find him huggable as all get- out, but he stubbornly refuses to run for either of those parties’ slots. I don’t understand. What’s he think is going to happen? In the middle of a debate, George W. Bush is going to turn to him, break down and say, “You. You have a gift. Yes you do. What was I trying to do? The Republican Party belongs to you, the real reformer. Forgive me, Godfather.”

Yeah, that’ll happen. Or at least McCain better hope it does, because otherwise we’re looking at six more months of Bush and Gore waltzing around the Ivy League Ballroom, and the only dance left for Iron John will be with the Yellow Ross of Texas. And word on the streets is Perot likes to lead.

Will Durst is covering the 2000 election for the MoJo Wire. He is also host of the PBS series “Livelyhood” and “The Citizen Durst Report,” and promises never again to be a “lifeline” on a television game show.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate