Seattle, One Year Later

The first anniversary of the massive anti-WTO protests in Seattle was only faintly echoed in Seattle’s streets — but the fallout continues to rain down on Seattle city officials.

Image: Silja Talvi

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The Battle of Seattle was recreated in miniature on Thursday as hundreds of demonstrators took to the streets to commemorate last year’s massive anti-WTO protests — and police hauled dozens of them off to jail.

Early in the day, an estimated 2,000 activists — including sea turtle-costumed environmentalists, sign-waving students, and a dozen topless Lesbian Avengers — marched peacefully through downtown. Seattle police, who last year worked the streets in full body armor, flashed a friendlier face this time, wearing regular uniforms and name tags despite the vandalization of nine Starbucks outlets the previous day and e-mailed death threats received at City Hall.

Seattle’s new police chief, Gil Kerlikowske, made a point of chatting up protesters and even provided a motorcycle escort for a cardboard anniversary cake dedicated to Mayor Paul Schell for “helping Seattle expose the WTO to the world.”

But tensions flared as evening approached, when riot gear-clad police attempted to force the dancing and singing activists off the streets near Fourth Avenue and Pine Street — ground zero of last year’s chaos. After negotiations, most protesters moved on to either a candlelight vigil or to a celebration-cum-public discussion at the Labor Temple.

A small group, however, soon returned, blocking a major intersection and reportedly throwing rocks and bottles at police. After three warnings, police moved in with pepper spray. Some 140 people were arrested, including an Associated Press photographer and a few people who said they were just innocent bystanders.

“Peaceful free speech is something we encourage in Seattle, but freedom of speech is not a grant to break the law,” said Dick Lilly, spokesman for Mayor Schell. “It’s fair to say that since Seattle, LA, Philadelphia, DC, and Prague, an element of the anti-globalization … groups is fairly deliberate in [its] attempts to provoke local government into police action in order to buy sympathy for their cause.”

Still, it was small-scale stuff compared to last Nov. 30, when Seattle’s streets erupted into chaos as police broke up clumps of protesters with tear gas and rubber bullets, and agitators smashed windows and defaced some downtown stores. Full-scale protests and mass arrests, abetted by the National Guard, continued for days, culminating in 600 arrests and an estimated $3 million in property damage.

~ ~

Since then, the Seattle police and Mayor Schell have had to defend themselves against a flurry of reports and investigations denouncing their response to the protests as excessively heavy-handed. A commission appointed by the Seattle City Council released a report in September which found that many demonstrators were not given adequate warning regarding the use of chemical irritants and other forceful methods, and that large-scale arrests — not chemical irritants — should have been the first tactic tried in response to “unlawful assemblies.” Amnesty International has also raised concerns about human rights violations of protesters in custody, while the American Civil Liberties Union issued a 95-page report blasting the city and the SPD for grossly mishandling WTO-related protests and violating demonstrators’ civil liberties.

(The SPD’s own assessment of its conduct admits some mistakes, but defends its use of chemical agents.)

More than 60 damage claims and lawsuits have been filed against the city, including a federal class-action case filed by Trial Lawyers for Public Justice in October. The suit charges that the city’s creation of a “no-protest zone” during the WTO conference constituted a violation of the First Amendment.

Yesterday, protesters converged at noontime, en masse, at the City Clerk’s office to file claims against the city for injuries and constitutional violations suffered during last year’s demonstrations.

“We’re asking for our city to make changes in the way that they respond to us when we speak out,” said Erica Kay, the group’s spokesperson.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate