Computer Monitor

Ted Smith of the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


It was The Insider gone digital: One morning last summer, Ted Smith opened his email and found a PowerPoint presentation prepared by the Sony Corporation for an electronics-industry conference. The document, mailed to him anonymously, suggested that companies hire an online agency to investigate environmental groups targeting the high-tech industry. Topping a list of what Sony called “well-organized groups” with “global reach” was the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, the San Jose-based organization Smith leads. “It was a vote of confidence in a way,” Smith jokes. “But you know that if they poke around, they’ll find that it’s only smoke and mirrors.”

Actually, what Sony’s emissaries would find if they were to investigate Smith’s 10-person operation is a local activist group that has found itself going global along with the industry it monitors. Founded in 1982 — after Smith’s wife, attorney Amanda Hawes, noticed that more and more of her clients were complaining about health problems caused by their exposure to hazardous chemicals in semiconductor factories — the Toxics Coalition has made a name for itself by publicizing what it calls “the dark side of high-tech development” worldwide.

“People are always trying to solve yesterday’s problem,” says Smith, a union organizer turned attorney. “But this industry is inventing tomorrow’s problems.” Among the most pressing of those problems, says Smith, is the growing pile of hazardous electronics waste accumulating in warehouses, attics, and offices worldwide. The National Safety Council estimates that only 11 percent of the computers discarded in the United States are recycled; the rest are either stored by their owners or find their way into landfills, where they can contribute to groundwater contamination. A single crushed monitor, for example, may leach as many as eight pounds of lead; a motherboard may contain any of 700 toxic substances including mercury, cadmium, and chromium.

Last year the coalition joined other environmental groups in support of a European Union proposal that would require manufacturers to take back and dispose of each computer they sell. The measure passed despite fierce opposition from industry and the Clinton administration; now, interest in reducing computer waste is building stateside as well. Massachusetts banned used monitors from landfills last year, and six other states are now considering similar proposals.

All this has made the coalition a formidable — if not always welcome — presence on its home turf. “Ted Smith has been a major source of disinformation in the valley,” says John Greenagel, a spokesman for electronics manufacturer AMD. “He’s demonized the industry — and that hasn’t harmed his wife’s law practice.”

Hawes is representing some 200 former workers and their families in a lawsuit against IBM scheduled to go to trial early this year. But Smith dismisses the criticism: “I’m the one out there raising hell,” he says. “She’s the one who scares them the most.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate