The Bush Files

A sampling of the day’s best independent news, views, and resources on US politics, keeping an eye on the Bush Administration. Updated each weekday.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


March 23, 2001

Ashcroft’s war on drugs — In These Times
Attorney General John Ashcroft wants to “reinvigorate” the war on drugs, but “it’s difficult to imagine how Bill Clinton could have been much harsher, short of public executions of drug dealers,” says Steven Wishnia.

A heartbeat away — CheneyHeartWatch.com
This parody site went up during Cheney’s heart scare in early March. With a realistic-looking EKG readout, the site’s administrators claim they have managed to fool at least one news organization into believing they were really monitoring the Vice President’s vitals via satellite. The site’s disclaimer says: “This site is meant as a political and social commentary on the public’s insatiable desire to know everything about anyone at any time.” (Thanks to Lincoln West for the tip.)

Pesticides lace Texas parks — Environmental News Network
The Texas Pesticide Information Network has released a report on the widespread use of chemical pesticides in Texas public parks, and the related risks to children. The report found dangerously high levels of toxins in dozens of parks, with the highest in George W. Bush’s hometown of Midland. While cities in other states have been phasing out chemical pesticide use in parks, a 1993 Texas law prohibits cities from regulating pesticides.

March 22, 2001

Bush coins new word! — Reuters
OK, sure, Bush’s butchering of the English language isn’t as dire as, say, his gutting of environmental laws or reproductive rights protections. But still, when he donates a word to the popular lexicon, we like to take note. Speaking to the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce in Washington on Monday, he described some businesses as “Hispanically owned.”

The GOP’s Libertarian problem — National Review
Ralph Nader may have garnered just 2 percent of the vote nationwide, but Democrats are still fuming that he cost Gore the election. What few observers have noted is that the GOP has a third-party nemesis of its own: the Libertarians. In both 1998 and 2000, a Republican Senate candidate lost to a Democrat by a margin much less than the total vote for the Libertarian in the same race. The most recent victim was Slade Gorton of Washington.

Cheney: Give nukes a chance — Reuters
For all the environmentalists who are so het up about carbon dioxide and its reputed role in global warming, Dick Cheney has a solution: “If you want to do something about carbon dioxide emissions, then you ought to build nuclear power plants. They don’t emit any carbon dioxide. They don’t emit greenhouse gases.” Nuclear: the next big thing in clean power.

Bush’s gay adviser — The Advocate
If he were black, critics would call him an Uncle Tom. But 22-year-old Tom Beddingfield claims to be a gay-rights activist, despite the fact he supported a California ballot proposal banning gay marriage. Now he’s rumored to be one of Bush’s top advisers on gay issues.

March 21, 2001

Conservatives think Bush too centrist — Christian Science Monitor
Get this: Even after George W. nominated the most conservative slate of cabinet secretaries since the Reagan Administration, rolled back reproductive freedoms, and proposed federal funding for faith-based organizations, the far-right thinks it might just be time to pressure Shrub because they fear he’s leaning too far to the center.

Hagel’s “reform” exposed — Public Citizen
Watchdog group Public Citizen says GOP Sen. Chuck Hagel’s “compromise” campaign finance bill — for those who think even the watered-down McCain-Feingold is too radical — “is a sham reform because it would keep nearly 60 percent of soft money in the political system and would do nothing to prevent it from being redirected to state parties.”

Demos to give GOP a little of own medicine — Reuters
Using the same law that the GOP used to roll back the Clinton administration’s last-minute ergonomics rules, Congressional Democrats (and a few rogue Republicans) are hoping to overturn Bush’s reinstitution of the “global gag rule,” which prevents federal funds from going to international organizations which perform, counsel, or advocate for abortion.

March 20, 2001

Powell suddenly a peacenik — Washington Post
Colin Powell, who owes his political ascent to his quarterbacking of the deadly bombing of Iraq during the Gulf War, must not have thought his words ironic yesterday when he prevailed upon the warring factions in the Middle East to stop shooting at each other: “[L]eaders have a responsibility to denounce violence, strip it of its legitimacy, stop it.”

Tax talk divides GOP — Roll Call
An aggressive campaign by House Republicans to pass an even bigger tax cut than the $1.6 trillion proposed by President Bush has Senate Republicans nervous. They already have a tough task in mustering enough votes to pass the smaller proposal.

Bush as amateur Greenspan — Boston Globe
We thought Bush learned a lesson in his first week on the job when he talked gloomily about the American economy and — poof! — down went the stock market. But he’s playing a tricky game, says The Globe’s Gene Sperling: in order to sell his tax cut, he needs to convince us that the economy is in bad enough shape to need such a measure. Yet at the same time, he has to keep saying happy, hopeful things about our economic outlook to avoid wholesale panic and a worsening of economic conditions. Bush’s toying with the economy for political gain is irresponsible, Sperling says.

Americans favor McCain’s finance proposal over Bush’s — Hotline Scoop
A CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll found that 43 percent of those surveyed said they favor McCain’s proposal for reforming campaign finance rules, while 33 percent said they preferred Bush’s ideas on the subject.

March 19, 2001

Tobacco love — The Gully
Last week, a group of lawmakers introduced the first real bipartisan bill since the Bush regime began. The law would classify nicotine as a drug and bring it under the regulatory control of the FDA. Problem is, it hasn’t a chance of winning the president’s signature because Bush is so heavily indebted to big tobacco, according to The Gully.

Lies, damn lies, and Bush statistics — The American Prospect
In their efforts to drum up support for the Bush tax plan, George W. and his cronies are citing some dubious statistics that simply don’t hold up under scrutiny, says The American Prospect.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate