The Bush Files

A sampling of the day’s best independent news, views, and resources on US politics, keeping an eye on the Bush Administration. Updated each weekday.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


March 2, 2001

In the Bush family fashion — Guardian (UK)
Sixteen-year-old Lauren Bush, the daughter of Dubya’s conspicuously inconspicuous brother Neil, was tapped by the fashionistas at Tommy Hilfiger to be that label’s “ambassador” this week. Says the Guardian, “By marrying the company name to that of the president, the American clothing giant has pulled off a fantastic ambition: to make good the heavy-duty symbolism it has for years used to market itself as a branch of the establishment.” (For the record, Tommy Hilfiger himself gave $5,000 to Democrats — including Bill Bradley, Joe Leiberman, and Charles Schumer — in the 2000 election cycle.)

Secret Service bails out Bush daughter’s beau — Associated Press
An 18-year-old Texas Christian University student was arrested over the weekend outside a fraternity house and charged with public drunkenness. The suspect, William Bridges, was belligerent, reportedly shouting repeatedly at police officers that he was dating Dubya’s daughter Jenna. Although the White House and Secret Service won’t comment, Tarrant County Jail officials say it was a Secret Service agent who bailed the boy out shortly after the arrest.

Dubya’s vulgar tax plan — Molly Ivins
There’s a trove of classic Ivinsisms in this one, such as: “[W]ith Bush, what you see is not what you get. What you hear is not what you get. What you get is what you get.” She points out that the “ordinary” couple Bush trotted out in his speech before Congress would receive $1,100 tax break under the Bush plan, while Bush himself would get a break 60 times that amount.

Bush, the leftist — The American Prospect
An early draft of Bush’s Tuesday address to Congress included a sentence advocating carbon-dioxide emission controls. According to right-wing columnist Robert Novak, conservatives in the White House demanded the line be excised, and it was. But the speech still included endorsements of some social programs even the most liberal Democrats could get behind. Bush clearly isn’t as absolutist about shrinking government as his far-right buddies might have hoped, and it has them hopping mad.

 

March 1, 2001

Bush says death penalty ‘unfair,’ ha ha — The Miami Herald
It’s fun to listen to Bush’s extemporaneous adventures. In an address before 4,000 people yesterday, Bush said “Those of us who spent time in the agricultural sector and in the heartland, we understand how unfair the death penalty is — the death tax is,” Bush said, correcting himself. He then made a joke of the slip: “I don’t want to get rid of the death penalty, just the death tax,” Bush said, laughing along with the crowd.

Bush’s budget hucksterism — The Progressive
Bush’s first big speech rang as hollow as those he delivered in his campaign, says Ruth Conniff. It was full of borrowed slogans and faux inclusiveness, and nice images meant to distract us from the mean reality of his administration.

Did the US media cover up election corruption? — MediaChannel.org
Brit journalist Gregory Palast says the US media missed the biggest story of the election: Republican operatives in Florida had thousands of purported felons purged from voter rolls, even though many of those disenfranchised were not, in fact, felons. This was front-lage news in Britain (a fact Palast likes to point up, since he was the guy on the story for The Observer), but not in the US, says Palast. May we remind him that it was MotherJones.com which broke that story, the day after the election? And that numerous other outlets — including his — later picked up the story in the US and Europe and ran with it?

 

Feb. 28, 2001

Bush stumbles over church-state line — Americans United for Separation of Church and State
Helen Thomas, the UPI White House correspondent who has covered nine administrations, took on George W. Bush in a contentious exchange at Bush’s first press conference. Thomas cornered Bush with this zinger: “Mr. President, why do you refuse to respect the wall between the church and state?” She went on to tell Bush, “You are a secular official.” Bush responded, “I agree, I am a secular official.” Thomas shot back, “And not a missionary.” (Thanks to Debbie Felix for the tip.)

Reagan’s haunting pardon — Reuters
The spotlight is on pardons made by Clinton and Bush Sr., but here’s a little story that seems to have been missed in the hoopla. An Oregon man who was pardoned by former President Reagan in 1981 for a failed bank robbery conviction dating back to 1970 was arrested in November for killing and dismembering his wife, and then burning her body.

 

Feb. 27, 2001

Tally No! — MSNBC
Eric Alterman says the Miami Herald recount of votes in disputed Florida counties, which seems to have confirmed Bush’s victory, is simply a symptom of Gore’s flawed post-election strategy. The former VP should have called for a recount in the entire state (which Alterman says would prove Gore’s plurality victory), instead of trying to lawyer himself into the White House by cherry-picking the counties in which he expected gains, which made him look like an opportunist.

Bush gets record low approval rating — Reuters
Even with Clinton doing his level best to distract the country from Bush’s verbal and political foul-ups, the prez scored the lowest approval rating — just 55 percent of Americans polled think he’s doing a good job — of any newly installed president since Eisenhower.

Legitimizing Dubya — The Consortium
The GOP has found its defining mission for the next four years, says the Consortium: gunning for those Congressional Democrats who still openly question the legitimacy of George W. Bush’s presidency.

 

Feb. 26, 2001

Grammar don’t make no difference — Reuters
After the president had multiple run-ins with pronouns and plurals in his first press conference last week, White House spinmistress Mary Matalin said the American people don’t care if George W. Bush uses proper grammar or not. Oh yeah? That’s what she think.

Bush Sr.’s Iran-Contra pardons — Federation of American Scientists
Back in December 1992, just before he left office, Dubya’s dad pardoned six figures involved in the Iran-Contra arms-for-hostages scandal — including former secretary of defense Caspar Weinberger, who was about to go on trial for his involvement in the affair. Critics say Weinberger’s trial might have exposed the extent of Bush Sr.’s knowledge of the covert operation when he was vice president under Reagan, and that the pardon was a deliberate cover-up.

Minorities lose in Bush tax plan — Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
According to this DC think tank, “more than one of every two black and Hispanic families with children would receive no assistance from the tax plan of the Bush Administration. Altogether, 6 million black and Hispanic families — and 12.6 million black and Hispanic children — would not be aided by the bill.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate