Gender Outlaws

A new federal hate crimes bill leaves out the most vulnerable.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


A bipartisan group of Congressional leaders has introduced a new hate crimes bill (curiously called the “Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act”) that would extend the federal definition of such crimes to include gays and lesbians and allow for federal assistance in local prosecutions.

Hate crimes against gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and transgendered people have more than tripled since the FBI began collecting statistics on the phenomenon just 10 years ago. The FBI’s most recent report on hate crimes statistics for 1999 showed 1,317 of the hate crimes reported in the US were based on sexual orientation. That’s almost 17 percent of all hate crimes reported to the bureau by local, state, and national law enforcement agencies that year. But since some law enforcement agencies don’t track such statistics, and because many victims of hate crimes don’t report them for fear of being outed, the real number is probably higher.

If you are not among those who believe that protection against discrimination based on sexual orientation amounts to “special rights,” the reintroduction of federal hate-crimes legislation is a great thing. And it is, mostly. Except the bill on the table just doesn’t go far enough. Specifically, it doesn’t apply to transgendered people, the segment of sexual minorities for which the rate of bias crimes — especially murder — is arguably growing fastest. A transgendered person is murdered somewhere in the US about once every three weeks.

The National Transgender Advocacy Coalition says the rate of bias-based murders of transgendered people is up 12 percent nationwide since 1994. Most of those murders took place in California and New York, although at least one murder occurred in each of 29 states and the District of Columbia. Confirming the real national rate is tough, though: transgendered people are even less likely than gays and lesbians to report attacks, according to experts, and such crimes are often not classified as hate-motivated because the victims are not technically gay.

What’s worse, say activists, is the silence of the media on murders of transgendered people, even as gay homicides like those of Matthew Shepard and Billy Jack Gaither attract high-profile headlines. The only significant exception was the coverage of the Brandon Teena case, and it didn’t hurt that there was an Oscar-nominated movie about that case. Lest we forget those whose deaths didn’t make the big screen, the transgender community has created an online memorial to its fallen.

New York gets it. Its city council is considering extending its hate crimes statute to include transgendered people. It was in New York that Amanda Milan, a transgendered prostitute, was murdered last year. She has since become an icon of a movement trying to gain visibility in the debate over hate crimes.

Bits and Pieces

COW POWER
California is desperate for power. So desperate that cow, er, “emissions” are being considered as a potentially harnessable source of gas. Experiments are under way to use bacteria to turn manure into fertilizer and methane (the same gas also emitted by cows’ digestive systems), which can be burned in gas-powered electrical generators.

CLEAN CHIPS
The manufacture of computer chips is one of the dirtiest, most environmentally unfriendly industrial processes around. So it’s good news that scientists at the US Department of Energy’s Los Alamos Laboratory have developed a new method of manufacturing using a nonflammable, non-toxic, environmentally friendly solvent that could greatly reduce water use and cut the volume of hazardous waste produced by computer chip makers.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate