The Bush Files

A sampling of the day’s best independent news, views, and resources on US politics, keeping an eye on the Bush Administration. Updated each weekday.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


May 26, 2001

White House blamed for Senate debacle — Boston Herald
In politics, there’s always a fall guy, and White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card just may be that man for the GOP in the aftermath of the Jim Jeffords defection. Card reportedly led the Republican leadership’s campaign to lean on Jeffords to come back in line with party orthodoxy, and may have alienated Jeffords enough to drive him right into the arms of the Democrats.

The Ted Olson Files — American Prospect
Ted Olson’s confirmation as solicitor general squeaked through the Senate this week, but the controversy surrounding Olson isn’t about to die down anytime soon. A peek into a still-secret report about Olson’s relationship with Kenneth Starr’s chief witness, David Hale, may reveal just how much Olson knew about the GOP’s “Arkansas Project” — and, by extension, whether he testified truthfully about his role in the so-called “vast right-wing conspiracy” to bring down President Clinton.

May 25, 2001

McCain slams GOP over Jeffords departure — Senate.gov
In a press release following Jim Jeffords’ announcement that he is leaving the GOP, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., lashed out at the Republican leadership’s attitude and tactics toward dissenting members: “Although we have lost our majority in the Senate, I do believe Senator Jeffords’ departure can have a positive impact on how our party responds to members who occasionally dissent from party orthodoxy. For his votes of conscience, he was unfairly targeted for abuse, usually anonymously, by short-sighted party operatives from their comfortable perches in K Street offices, and by some Republican members of Congress and their staff. Perhaps those self-appointed enforcers of party loyalty will learn to respect honorable differences among us, learn to disagree without resorting to personal threats, and recognize that we are a party large enough to accommodate something short of strict unanimity on the issues of the day.”

Jeffords is a product of Vermont politics — Guardian (UK)
Jim Jeffords’ move away from the Republican Party says less about the contentious nature of the US Senate than the shifting political climate of his home state, ventures the Guardian . “[W]hat is really changing is Vermont, whose politics are moving leftwards in that odd backwoods way that makes New England the least predictable of all US political regions.”

May 24, 2001

The potential defectors — Various
Sen. James Jeffords may have pulled the trigger first, but other senators on both sides of the aisle are teetering between party loyalty and defection. In particular, Georgia Democrat Zell Miller, who was rumored to be considering joining the GOP just a few weeks back, has started feeling the heat from GOP leaders who want to restore their majority. He has pledged not to make a move “at this time.” Rhode Island Republican Lincoln Chafee is chafing at his party’s agenda, but says he won’t be switching… yet. Both men are likely to feel pressure from both parties to make a strategic move.

The quick-fix myth — Hartford Courant
Bush touts his tax cut as a magic solution for everything from flagging consumer confidence to the slowing economy. He even suggested that passing it quickly would put money in citizens’ pockets to help defray the rising cost of gasoline this summer. But taxpayers won’t see a penny of relief until autumn at the earliest — and most of the tax cut package will be phased in over the next 11 years. Hardly an overnight miracle, notes the Courant.

May 23, 2001

GOP donor fete raises eyebrows — Houston Chronicle
A reception for deep-pocketed GOP donors hosted by Vice President Dick Cheney Monday at the National Observatory (which is, we were surprised to learn, also Cheney’s official residence) has campaign-finance watchdogs seething. Observers are drawing comparisons to the Clinton Administration’s White House coffee klatches and Lincoln Bedroom sleepovers, which were then characterized by Republicans as improper use of federal property for fundraising. Golfer Ben Crenshaw, a big GOP donor, spent the night in the White House as Bush’s guest.

“Who’s next — Mother Jones?” — Salon
In his commencement speech Sunday at Notre Dame, a “shameless” President Bush quoted Dorothy Day, a prominent historical figure in the progressive Catholic movement, in order to burnish his “compassionate image,” reports Joan Walsh. The move was so cynical and cheap that Walsh asks, “Who’s next — Mother Jones?”

May 22, 2001

Bush’s former professor calls him a ‘spoiled brat’ — Japan Today
Yoshihiro Tsurumi, who was George W. Bush’s professor of macroeconomics and international business at Harvard’s Graduate School of Business in the 1970s, says his recollection of the future president was that he was a “spoiled brat,” “totally dependent on his father,” and “more conservative than his father.” Said Tsurumi, “It’s safe not to have a romantic illusion about President Bush” when it comes to his policy toward Japan and China. (Thanks to BuzzFlash for the tip.)

Bush’s Florida lawyers get cushy administration jobs — Slate
Controversial solicitor-general nominee Ted Olson is hardly the only lawyer from Bush’s Florida legal team who has — or may yet — get a plum job in the administration.

Administration to resist chemical weapons ban change — Guardian (UK)
The Bush Administration doesn’t yet seem to have met an international treaty it didn’t want to trash. This time, it’s the 1972 international ban on chemical and biological weapons. The administration is apparently preparing to scuttle a proposed amendment that would establish a protocol for verifying compliance.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate