Lockdown Shutdown?

Corrections Corporation of America’s prison in Youngstown, Ohio, has seen prisoner killings and escapes — and soon, the for-profit lockdown may have no prisoners at all.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Once famously plagued by violence and escapes, an Ohio prison owned by America’s largest operator of for-profit lockups now faces a new problem: it may soon have no prisoners.

Corrections Corporation of America’s 2,016-bed facility in Youngstown, Ohio currently houses overflow inmates from Washington, D.C. But the federal Bureau of Prisons is taking charge of the capital’s prison system and has announced plans to move all the Youngstown inmates to other facilities by August.

That leaves CCA with two options: find a new contract, or sell the prison. Neither is likely to be easy, given the facility’s troubled history (see the Mother Jones story, “Steel Town Lockdown”). Opened in May 1997, the prison was supposed to house only medium-security inmates, but CCA brought in some of D.C.’s most dangerous cons to help keep its beds filled. As a result, the facility saw 20 stabbings and two killings in its first year, and an escape by six inmates — including five convicted murderers — the next. An ensuing lawsuit forced CCA to send back the maximum-security inmates and boost safety provisions.

Faced with the possible loss of some 500 local jobs — a major concern in the rusting steel town — Youngstown’s mayor, once a a bitter critic of the prison, has turned into one of its biggest boosters. After the 1998 escapes, Mayor George McKelvey told reporters, “Knowing what I know now, I would never have allowed CCA to build a prison here.” Now, he says he’ll do everything he can to keep it open. With the most violent prisoners back in DC, says McKelvey, “it’s as quiet as a church over there.”

McKelvey told The Vindicator, a local newspaper, in early May that he’s willing to grant CCA some leeway in the allowable classification of prisoners they would accept. That could mean accepting “high medium-security” prisoners, said McKelvey, a higher level than the facility currently accepts.

That disturbs critics like Al Gerhardstein, an attorney who brought the 1999 lawsuit against CCA. “The real question is, is the mayor willing to keep the place open to save some jobs at the expense of the security measures that made it a safe prison?”

Adds state senator Bob Hagan, who sponsored a successful bill to empower McKelvey to amend CCA’s contract: “It took two murders and 20 stabbings to convince the state to pass my legislation. Now McKelvey wants to change the classification of prisoners. We can’t afford to go through that again.”

Ohio Governor Bob Taft, meanwhile, has asked the federal government to buy the facility, a move he says could help alleviate crowding in federal prisons, sustain local jobs, and help pull CCA out of its billion-dollar debt. CCA is considering this, but says pursuing new clients takes precedence. “We’re hoping for another go at it in Youngstown,” says CCA spokesperson Steve Owen.

Hagan is hoping they don’t get the chance. “It’s like a monster that won’t go away,” he says. “I know Youngstown needs the jobs. A federal prison will supply jobs just the same. CCA had their chance, and they proved it’s not sustainable for a small town to rely on a private prison economy.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate