Missing in Action

The US government has studied the health effects of Agent Orange on Vietnam veterans — but what about the Vietnamese?

Image: AP/Wideworld

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Deadly chemicals sprayed by US forces during the Vietnam war continue to haunt the people of Southeast Asia decades after the war’s end, according to a study published this month.

American researchers studied blood samples taken from residents of Bien Hoa City in southern Vietnam and found that the vast majority had elevated levels of a highly poisonous dioxin found in the chemical defoliant Agent Orange. (Mother Jones magazine investigated the legacy of Agent Orange in February 2000.)

“The really distressing finding for us was the fact that some of the children we were looking at, who were born long after the spraying had ended, had very elevated levels of these toxins,” says Arnold Schecter, a medical and environmental health researcher at the University of Texas School of Public Health at Dallas who headed the research effort.

The study, published in the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine focused on people living near a former American military base where Agent Orange was heavily used in 1971. Of the 20 residents Schecter tested, 19 had elevated amounts of TCDD, the poisonous dioxin in Agent Orange, in their bodies.

TCDD has been linked to cancer, immune deficiency, reproductive and developmental illness, nervous system disorders, endocrine disruption and birth defects. Researchers believe that residual Agent Orange sprayed during the war is leaching into the water throughout southern Vietnam, then moving up the food chain into humans, especially those who eat large amounts of fish. Schecter estimates that as many as one million Vietnamese may have been affected by the contamination.

Over the years, Schecter says, the US government has displayed no interest in studying how chemical spraying in Vietnam affected the health of the local people. But that seems to be changing. Under pressure from American veterans’ groups, Congress this year for the first time authorized federal money for research into the health effects of Agent Orange in Vietnam. The veterans believe the $850,000 appropriation could benefit American soldiers who were exposed to the herbicide if research in Vietnam finds further links between defoliant spraying and illness.

But almost as soon as it was appropriated, the research money was caught in a diplomatic dispute between American and Vietnamese officials. “Vietnam has linked any research there to payment of what they call humanitarian assistance to victims of Agent Orange,” says a State Department official who asks that his name not be used. The Vietnamese request, he explains, rankles US officials, who insist that all claims related to the war were settled in 1995, during the delicate negotiations surrounding the formal re-establishment of diplomatic relations between the two countries.

For now, Schecter and his team are relying on private funding to support their research; they plan another trip to Laos and Vietnam this summer. “We had thought that Agent Orange was a part of history,” Schecter says. “But this research shows that in Vietnam, it’s not simply a part of history, it’s a current public health crisis.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate