Sheltering Tax Shelters

The Bush administration is pulling out of a campaign to crack down on international tax evaders.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In a little-noticed policy turnaround, the Bush administration recently announced that the US will no longer support an international effort to rein in “tax havens” — small nations whose lax laws allow wealthy individuals and corporations to evade trillions of dollars of income taxes in their home countries (see the Mother Jones story, Trillion-Dollar Hideaway).

Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill declared on May 10 that the US will back out of the the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s initiative to cut down on border-hopping tax dodgers. O’Neill’s opposition, widely regarded as a major setback to the OECD, a group of 30 industrialized nations including the US, marks a dramatic break from the Clinton administration’s support of the international effort to rein in international tax evaders. American citizens alone are estimated to have at least $500 billion secretly cached overseas, costing the US government hundreds of millions in unpaid taxes — and those numbers are widely thought to be growing.

The OECD issued a report in November calling on countries to end what it calls “harmful tax practices” that facilitate foreign tax evasion. These tax havens, many of them in the Caribbean, are famous for fiscal policies that both invite foreign investors with minimal taxes and frustrate foreign attempts to find tax evaders. The OECD is asking such tax havens to start trading information with other countries during legal investigations, to ensure their banks provide financial information, and to give up the common practice of taxing foreigners at lower rates than their own citizens. The OECD established a timeline for tax haven countries to comply and set out a list of potential penalties to induce them to do so.

O’Neill says the administration’s decision was prompted out of respect for other nations’ rights to determine their own tax system. More outspoken conservatives like House Majority Leader Dick Armey of Texas who oppose the OECD plan say it’s an effort to quash competition among governments to attract business by lowering taxes. The European countries heading up the anti-tax haven effort, critics charge, are really trying to raise tax rates in other countries to the levels of their own. “European countries are going after US economic advantage and they’re starting with these small countries,” says Andrew Quinlan, president of The Center for Freedom and Prosperity.

The anti-OECD push has also picked up some moral support from the Congressional Black Caucus. Dozens of caucus members, including representatives Maxine Waters and Charles Rangel, sent a letter to O’Neill saying the push to close up the tax haven loophole could hurt the economies of developing Caribbean countries. “The free flow of capital plays a critical role in improving economic conditions in poorer nations,” they wrote.

OECD spokesman Nicholas Bray says the group does favor tax competition, but wants it on a fair and open basis. The OECD, says Bray, only labels countries as tax havens if they engage in at least one of three “unfair” practices: not supporting transparency in their legal system (e.g. not allowing prosecutors access to bank records), failure to exchange certain information with foreign bodies, or giving foreign investors lower tax rates.

O’Neill has left open the possibility of supporting a pared-down anti-tax haven initiative in the future. “Organizations like the OECD can be used to build a framework for exchanging specific and limited information necessary for the prosecution of illegal activity … We cannot tolerate those who cheat on their US taxes by hiding behind a cloak of secrecy,” he said in announcing the administration’s withdrawal from the OECD campaign. Then again, thanks to Bush’s tax policies, many of the millionaires who have been taking their cash offshore could soon find more favorable rates closer to home.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate