There Otter Be a Law

Would you like to decide how your tax dollars are spent? Meet an unlikely ally.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Congressman C.L. “Butch” Otter, R-Idaho, may be a new kid on Capitol Hill, but he’s already got the attitude.

He was busted in 1999 for illegally filling in wetlands on his ranch near the Boise River and fined $80,000 by the Environmental Protection Agency. Otter had been constructing a huge bass lake lined with waterfalls and flowerbeds on his property without securing the proper permits. This was the third instance in which Otter had been cited for altering wetlands without a permit. For months, he refused to pay the fine — even after it was reduced to $50,000. He gave in last week.

Just another story of an arrogant, hypocritical lawmaker who believes himself to be above the law? Worse: Otter sits on the Water Resources and Environment subcommittee of the House Transportation Committee, which oversees federal water projects, water-pollution controls, and… wetlands protection.

But what’s especially curious about Otter’s case was his argument that he should be able to dictate how the fine is spent. Otter says he intends to introduce legislation that would give those paying environmental fines a choice on what the money should be used for.

What a great idea. Why not design the bill so that any payment to the feds is spent at the payer’s discretion? I, for one, would like to ensure that all my taxes go to social programs and not a penny to the Pentagon or George W. Bush’s salary.

Well, maybe we can’t tell the government how to spend our money, but since this year most of us are getting a tax rebate courtesy of W., we can choose to spend those dollars wisely. In fact, a movement is afoot to persuade lefties to put their rebate where they wish their government’s priorities were. The Gen-X-focused non-profit Third Millennium has created a Web site called DonateRebate.org to make donating one’s tax-rebate check easy and painless. The folks at Working Assets are going one better: they’ll match your donation to a selected list of nonprofits.

Bits and Pieces

CLOWNING AROUND WITH THE FIRST AMENDMENT
A street clown in Provincetown on Cape Cod has enlisted the help of the ACLU after local business leaders lobbied police to reject his request for a public performance permit. Numerous complaints were lodged against the street performer for allegedly hooting at girls, making homophobic remarks, and performing while drunk. ACLU staff attorney Sarah Wunsch says simply not liking someone isn’t enough reason to obstruct a person’s livelihood.

LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR TAKES ON ABERCROMBIE & FITCH
Lt. Gov. Corrine Wood of Illinois is on a mission to make Abercrombie & Fitch stop being so naughty. The governor started a campaign to boycott A&F after her daughter received a catalog for the clothing company which contained what Wood felt was inappropriately suggestive imagery involving minors. “After discussing this discovery with my husband, I decided that I simply could not sit silently by while this catalog infiltrated thousands of unsuspecting households across Illinois. Working with many of the same support organizations listed on this website, we launched a campaign to alert the public of this catalog and we called for a boycott.” Although Abercrombie & Fitch restricts the catalog to subscriptions only, mails it in a plain wrapper, and even requests proof that subscribers are 18 or older, Wood is not satisfied. She calls A&F’s actions “a series of gimmicks that parents and concerned citizens see right through.”

NO HUBBY, NO BABY
Single women in Slovenia have lost the right to in-vitro fertilization, thanks to a referendum in the predominantly Roman Catholic country. Married women will continue to enjoy access to the service, which had been briefly available. Approximately 70 percent of Slovenian voters opposed access for single women.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate