Deporting to Death?

A Los Angeles gang-peace organizer faces an immigration ruling that his supporters say could be a death sentence.

Image: Donna Decesare

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Alex Sanchez has worked for years to calm the violence between the warring gangs that dominate Los Angeles’ Pico Union/Koreatown area — a role that has won him the respect of gang members as well as some of California’s leading politicians. But now he faces a deportation hearing that could not only end his peace-making — it might also lead to his own violent death.

Sanchez, a 30-year-old citizen of El Salvador, former gang member, and current program director of the Los Angeles and San Salvador-based youth organization Homies Unidos, is facing deportation charges before Immigration Court Judge Peters Collantes in a trial beginning today. Neither side disputes his undocumented status. But Sanchez’s supporters say deportation would be tantamount to an execution order.

Many current and former gang members deported to El Salvador have been killed in recent years. Since 1999, according to Sanchez’s lawyer and Homies Unidos, five members of the group have been deported to El Salvador — and all five have been murdered.

“We are very fearful for his life, knowing what we know about what happens to gang members or former gang members in El Salvador,” says Angela Sanbrano, executive director of the Central American Resource Center of Los Angeles.

No one has been convicted of any of the killings of Homies Unidos members, says Sanbrano. But Sanchez and his supporters believe the killings are the work of either street gangs or right-wing vigilantes. Homies Unidos’ efforts in Los Angeles and San Salvador, says Sanchez, directly threaten the gangs’ transnational growth and strength.

In recent years, hundreds of convicted criminals, including many gang members, have been deported from Los Angeles to El Salvador — where they have often simply replicated their gang culture anew. As the Salvadoran gangs compete in a bloody battle for numbers, power, and prestige, Homies Unidos’ peace organizing stands in the way, says Sanchez.

The right-wing vigilantes, on the other hand, view all former gang members as a criminal element that needs to be eradicated.

“Former death squad members are involved in a ‘social cleansing’ program,” says Mayra Gomez, El Salvador country specialist with Amnesty International USA. “They do actively target people such as alleged criminals, prostitutes, street children, and transvestites.”

“I fear both sides, because of what I’ve been speaking against,” says Sanchez. “This hearing is a life-or-death decision.”

Sanchez has attracted a powerful set of supporters, including civil rights stalwart Reverend James Lawson, film director Robert Greenwald, former state Assembly Speaker and current Los Angeles mayoral candidate Antonio Villaraigosa, and former state senator and famed progressive Tom Hayden.

Reverend Norman S. Johnson, Sr., executive director of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference of Los Angeles, worries that if Sanchez is deported, “the community would experience a void in leadership from a true survivor committed to peace, justice, and non-violence.”

Since becoming an organizer with Homies in 1998, Sanchez has been credited with helping keep a tenuous peace in central Los Angeles, where mostly Latino rival gangs once killed each other by the dozens every year.

Homies Unidos works with other local groups to provide educational and cultural programs to local youths. They have formed a coalition called “The Peacemakers” with other gang workers to expand a truce movement launched by black and Latino gangs after the 1992 riots.

A former member of the Mara Salvatrucha gang, which is composed mainly of Salvadorans, Sanchez maintains a close relationship with many gang members. “That’s what it’s all about — maintaining this trust with the gang members in order to have them change their ways and be a positive person in their own community,” he says.

Sanchez was born in San Salvador in 1971 and came to the US at the age of six, a refugee of his country’s brutal civil war. During the late 80s, Sanchez’s family obtained green cards, but Sanchez had run away from home by that time and joined the then-new Mara Salvatrucha. “It was a complete liberation, it was complete independence. I wanted to rebel against everybody,” he says. As a result, he never secured his papers.

Sanchez has been deported once before. In 1994, he was returned to San Salvador after serving time for a auto-theft felony conviction. He slipped back over the border again the next year, returning to his Los Angeles neighborhood. There, he met Magdaleno Rose-Avila, the founder of Homies Unidos, who steered him toward peace work. Inspired by Rose-Avila’s mentoring and hoping to do better for his newborn son, Sanchez joined Homies as a volunteer, removed many of his old gang tattoos, and began to turn his life around.

Father Greg Boyle, who runs East Los Angeles’ gang intervention program, Jobs For A Future, has watched Alex’s transformation. “His impact on that community is enormous,” says Boyle. “It’s not just that he’s been there and done that, it’s that (gang members) see him as a genuinely caring adult.”

But despite Sanchez’s community support, the INS is pressing forward with deportation charges against him.

INS officials say they cannot comment directly on Sanchez’ case due to privacy laws.

Sanchez’s latest immigration troubles, he believes, stem from his success as a gang peace activist. In 1999, Sanchez began putting youths complaining about police brutality in touch with civil rights lawyers. He took a more active role in mediating potential conflicts between gangs. At one point, he says, he prevented a bloody war with a simple three-way phone call.

But just as Sanchez’ street organizing began to show signs of progress, Homies Unidos came under the scrutiny of officers of LAPD’s controversial, now-disbanded CRASH anti-gang unit, according to Sanchez’s lawyer, Allen Diamante. Homies Unidos members say that police told them that their peace meetings seemed to be a front for the creation of a “supergang.”

In January 2000, CRASH officers arrested Sanchez and turned him over to the INS, despite a city council executive order that limits police intervention in immigration cases. Meanwhile, the US Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles moved to have Sanchez deported for illegally re-entering the country.

Sanchez’s case quickly became a cause celebre. At the 2000 Democratic Convention, hundreds of demonstrators chanted “Free Alex Sanchez!” during a protest against the Los Angeles Police Department’s Rampart Division. The same day, Sanchez, who has spent much of his life in prison or juvenile detention, says he organized a hunger strike to protest living conditions at the INS Detention Facility at Terminal Island.

He was released in late September after a federal judge reduced his felony conviction to a misdemeanor. Under pressure from then-State Senator Hayden’s office, the US Attorney dropped its illegal re-entry case. But the INS continues to press its bid for deportation.

In 2000, after an almost decade-long decline, violent crimes in inner Los Angeles spiked upward. Murders alone increased by 25 percent from 1999. Sanchez, among others, attributes this in part to a resurgence in gang activity.

Sanchez worries that, amidst the recession, gang violence will again rise. “You can only hold a truce for so long. But then what do you do after that? That’s when you have to bring in resources into the community, into the youth,” he says.

If Sanchez is deported, his supporters say, there will be one less person to help maintain that truce — and he himself might not survive long enough to witness the outcome.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate