From Enron to Activism

When the Houston energy giant began its spectacular implosion last year, a few former employees found themselves unexpectedly cast as high-profile activists for workers’ rights.

Image: AP/WideWorld

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


When asked whether he considers himself an activist, Dennis Vegas pauses before offering an answer.

“I don’t know if that label applies,” says Vegas, who, like thousands of other onetime Enron employees, lost his job in December when the giant Houston energy firm began its spectacular implosion. Nonetheless, Vegas says that he has been moved to use his experience — and the attention that has come with it — to ensure that other American workers don’t suffer a similar fate.

“If that’s being socially responsible, I’ll take that one,” he says.

Investors lost millions when Enron, the seventh-largest company in the nation at the time, filed for bankruptcy in December. The collapse of the stock was particularly damaging for company employees like Vegas, who saw retirement accounts loaded with Enron stock wiped out.

In the wake of Enron’s bankruptcy — the costliest in US history — two large groups representing Enron workers formed, the Ad Hoc Committee of Former Enron Employees and the Severed Enron Employees Coalition. Both are focused on reclaiming employees’ lost pensions, retirement funds and severance packages.

For a few former Enron workers, however, the fight is not simply about recouping lost money. Lending their voices to the emerging national campaign for pension law reform, Vegas and others now find themselves appearing alongside labor leaders and progressive activists, providing a human face to the Enron collapse and urging Washington lawmakers to give the nation’s workers more authority to manage their own retirement investments and increased protection against losing those investments as a result of their employer’s bankruptcy.

A vice president of brand management and strategic marketing at Enron for nearly five years, Vegas says most US workers have simply never considered how existing pension and bankruptcy laws could place them in the same risky position as the employees of the now-infamous Houston firm.

“Very few people haven’t heard of Enron, but very few people understand what structurally permitted it to take place,” says Vegas, his slight Bronx accent a reminder of a New York City childhood. “When they begin to do their own self-analysis, they begin to find out that we are not alone — that they are themselves vulnerable in many respects and that it’s imperative that they take some action to protect themselves.”

Debbie Perrotta acknowledges that she gave such concerns little thought during her time at Enron.

“I trusted Enron. You know, I really did,” says Perrotta, who was a senior administrative assistant at the Houston firm. “They made you feel like you were one part of the family. I was comfortable there.”

Jolted out of that comfortable life by the company’s collapse, Perrotta has since accepted an invitation to testify before a Senate committee and appeared with progressive leaders at a gathering of political and social activists in Austin last month. Perrotta has speaking dates lined up into November.

“I never did this before. I never spoke publicly before,” says Perrotta. “I’ve channeled my energy, my anger, into something positive.”

Still, Vegas and Perrotta remain exceptions in the larger community of former Enron workers.

“We’re not political activists,” says Rod Jordan, chairman of the all-volunteer SEEC. “Although, we … encourage our members to get out there and become active and support whatever they believe in, we don’t do it as an official function of our group.”

Vegas and Perrotta both trace their own activism to the Rev. Jesse Jackson’s January visit to Houston. Jackson, who met with both Enron employees and the company’s patriarch, Kenneth Lay, used the occasion to call for greater severance pay for laid-off workers and expanded protections for workers’ rights under corporate bankruptcy laws. Jackson then accompanied a group of former Enron employees to Washington, where they urged lawmakers to take up the bankruptcy and pension reform initiatives.

The employees who joined Jackson in the nation’s capital have since joined with other current and former Enron workers to form a loose coalition. While the group itself has no distinct agenda, Vegas and Perrotta have both emerged as compelling advocates for pension and bankruptcy reform.

“They’re making a difference for every single one of their [former] co-workers. It’s the difference that a dozen really committed people can make for everyone,” says Kathy Roeder, an AFL-CIO staff member who has been working with Vegas and Perrotta. “They’ve done an outstanding job of building a network of former employees and these are not workers that were organized. None of them really had an organizing background.”

“These are people who have a very powerful message,” says Jim Hightower, co-organizer of the Rolling Thunder Down Home Democracy Tour, the Austin gathering — which Mother Jones has supported and helped to sponsor — where Perrotta and Vegas both spoke. “It’s no longer poor people who are getting stomped on. It’s now the middle class and soon to be the upper middle class.”

Having met with groups from Oregon to New York and Louisiana to Wisconsin, Vegas says his resolve has only grown. While still uncomfortable calling himself an activist, the former executive seems comfortable embracing an increasingly active role in the pension reform fight.

“You begin to develop alliances with people who maybe saw things you didn’t see many, many years ago and have been consistently struggling to get a message out,” he says. “Because there’s so much focus on Enron, we have the platform for major changes, major reforms and so, it’s like ‘carpe diem,’ you need to take advantage of it while it’s hot.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate