Biking While Black

Charlie and Davon King just wanted to ride their bikes. But when police in the predominantly white Detroit suburb of Eastpointe repeatedly stopped the African-American brothers, their parents filed suit. Then the family’s lawyer, reviewing police records, found a startling pattern.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In the past 10 years, racial profiling has become a buzzword in city halls and courthouses across the nation. But while most of the debate revolves around black and Hispanic men stopped by police while driving, a federal judge in Detroit this fall will hear a case involving a different group of plaintiffs — kids on bicycles. In Bennett v. City of Eastpointe, 21 African American plaintiffs allege that they were stopped because of their race in a Detroit suburb when they were between 10 and 18 years old.

Like many sweeping cases, this one started small. In 1995, several months after moving from Detroit to predominantly white Eastpointe, Davon King, then 12, and his older brother, Charlie, 14, were riding to a neighborhood store. A police car pulled up and an officer shouted at them to stop. Black kids were stealing bikes in Eastpointe and taking them to Detroit, the officer told them. He asked for their names, IDs, and bike registrations, then waved them on.

A few weeks later, as the brothers rode to Kmart, a police car headed toward them — with the siren screaming and lights flashing. Again, an officer ordered them off their bikes. “I was nervous,” Davon remembers. “‘I haven’t done anything,’ I thought, ‘so why is he stopping me?'” Then, a white kid pedaled by. “I was mad,” Davon says. “This Caucasian kid rolled right in front of the cops. For all they knew he could have been stealing that bike and taking it to Detroit.”

This time, when Davon and Charlie told their parents, the King family decided to curtail their bike riding. “My father was afraid that the police would do something more severe,” Davon says.

Charles King Sr. also complained to city officials. Eastpointe’s chief of police defended his officers’ actions in a memo to the city manager, citing reports of black kids stealing bikes. “My instructions to the officers were to investigate any black youths riding through our subdivisions,” he wrote. In 1998, the Kings filed two lawsuits against Eastpointe in connection with the bike stops and other incidents of alleged racial harassment; one case has been settled and the other one is under appeal. But while reviewing police logs and reports, the Kings’ lawyer, Charles Chomet, discovered a startling pattern: Between 1995 and 1998, Eastpointe police had stopped more than 100 black kids aged 11 to 18 on their bikes, searching or handcuffing some — even confiscating bikes — before releasing them. During the same period, only 40 white cyclists had been stopped.

Chomet filed a new discrimination case on behalf of 21 kids who had been stopped, and the American Civil Liberties Union, which is party to more than a dozen lawsuits on racial profiling of black motorists nationwide, joined the suit. The plaintiffs are asking for $21 million in damages, mandatory training for police, and an end to racial profiling of kids on bikes. “Police harassment and racial stereotyping at such an early age destroys kids’ faith in police and other institutions and erodes their confidence in society,” says Chomet. “The case highlights, in a way no other case has, the injustice of law enforcement based primarily on race.”

Davon and Charlie, both in college now, say they are proud of what their family started. But, notes Davon, he still doesn’t feel entirely safe on the streets. “The more I talk about what happened, the angrier and angrier I get,” he says. “I just want to live my life like a normal young man.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate