Mother Jones Daily: Briefing

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Smoking Canadians Out of Their Holes
The EPA’s Hamburger Helper

International News
Smoking Canadians Out of Their Holes

Relations between the US and Canada, already strained by Canada’s refusal to kowtow to Bush, are “officially going to pot,” as Robert Lusetich of Australia’s Herald-Sun writes. Canada’s recent push for the decriminilization of marijuana has infuriated US drug czars, and caused the Bush administration to threaten the Canadian economy with tighter restrictions on trade.

The countries’ recent fallings out, evidenced by Bush’s cancellation of a visit to Ottawa (Bush opted to invite Australian Prime Minister John Howard to Texas instead) have sent Canadians a pointedly unsubtle message, as Alex Beam of The Boston Globe reports:

“This is the message: Australia = good, brave, ‘willing’ Commonwealth country; Canada = bad, stoner, un-‘willing’ Commonwealth country . In case Canada is hard of hearing, the White House slapped a punitive tariff on its wheat exports over the weekend to make sure it’s paying attention.

Canada, which has debated decriminalizing pot for nearly three decades, was somewhat shocked by the US’s sudden desire to preserve what the Office of National Drug Policy’s special assistant referred to as “the integrity of the hemisphere,” writes Frances Bula of the Vancouver Sun. The Canadian Supreme Court will rule on a marijuana case this week, and Prime Minister Jean Chrétien plans to introduce legislation that rescinds some of the country’s restrictions on marijuana. Bush’s drug czar, John Walters, has directly asserted that relinquishing restrictions on Canada’s marijuana would result in the “ loss of the mutual co-operative partnership we’ve had with Canadians” in the past, reports Tim Harper of the Toronto Star. Canadian federal justice official Richard Mosley, who oversees criminal law policy, explained that, despite Walters’ claims to the contrary, decriminalizing the drug in Western Europe and Australia did not increase its use. Walters’ painfully ironic retort only served to enforce the Canadians’ point, as Harper observes:

“Walters used an analogy many Canadians might find amusing — gun control. If laws were relaxed on possession of illegal weapons, he asked, does anyone believe there would be a decrease in gun crime?

‘That would be ludicrous. The same principle applies to drugs,’ he said.

Environment
The EPA’s Hamburger Helper

With the help of the Environmental Protection Agency, factory farm industry leaders stand to get out from under clean air environmental laws.

The Environment News Service reports,

“This backroom deal smells every bit as bad as the stench from these animal factories,” said John Walke, director of the Natural Resources Defense Council’s (NRDC) Clean Air Program. “It is yet another example of the Bush administration trying to dismantle our bedrock environmental laws at the expense of public health.”

Despite rural community complaints about factory livestock farms polluting local skies and ground water sources, farmers may receive a “get out of environmental enforcement free” card from lawmakers. The Environmental Protection Agency has negotiations under way with agricultural industry leaders about Clean Air Act and Superfund exemptions for large livestock farms throughout the U.S.

A National Academy of Sciences report prompted negotiations by stating that stricter water regulations on farms may result in increased air pollution, but those statements were inconclusive.New York Times reporter Jennifer Lee reports:

“‘I think it’s a done deal between the negotiators,’ said William Becker, the executive director of State and Territorial Air Pollution Administrators. ‘This is a pattern of where the industry meets behind closed doors with the government.’ A large hog or chicken farm can generate millions of gallons of waste and hundreds of tons of fecal dust particles annually. In the case of hog farms, the waste is often gathered into open-air cesspools that release hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and methane gases, all of which are known to be toxic in high concentrations.”

Former EPA head, Eric Schaeffer went on to describe the negotiations as a political arrangement that had little evidence to back up it up.

For more information on the type of pollution factory farms cause, see the National Resource Defense Council’s summary statement on farm pollution.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate