Preaching a Slow Approach

For most in America, the Slow movement is a culinary excursion. For Stefano Cimicchi, the Mayor of Orvieto and the president of Slow Cities, it is a social, economic, and civic philosophy.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Imagine a city with a call center for residents to express concerns about their quality of life. Now imagine it is New York. Stefano Cimicchi, mayor of Orvieto, founding member of Slow Cities movement and its current president, believes such a vision can be made a reality — and so do 63 other mayors around the world.

Citta Slow, or the Slow City Association, is Slow Food’s sister movement. What Slow Food means for the table, Slow Cities means for the town. Dedicated to the concept of considered living, a Slow City is judged by the quality of its physical and gastronomic environment. In order to be a Slow City, the community must be committed to ecological preservation, sustainable development, and among many other statutes and laws, a quality of life call center.

Stefano Cimicchi has been at the vanguard of Citta Slow and speaks with Mother Jones about the future of Slow Cities and their unhurried migration across the Atlantic.

MotherJones.com: How did the Slow City movement emerge?

Stefano Ccimicchi: In 1998 Slow Food met with the mayors of the cities of Bra, Greve in Chianti, Orvieto, and Positano to create an international network of Slow Cities. I have been closely involved as the Mayor of Orvieto, one of the founding partners.

MJ: What are the goals of a Slow City and how do you achieve those goals?

SC: A Slow City is committed to improving the quality of life of its residents. We support traditional local foods, we try to make Orvieto a hospitable place for visitors, and we work hard to make the city a seamless part of the urban fabric. For example, Orvieto recently closed the historical town center to all car traffic. Two large parking lots outside the city center host all the visitors’ cars and save the town from traffic, pollution, and noise.

MJ: Has there been any resistance to such measures?

SC: At first the shopkeepers were not happy. They were concerned their businesses would be hurt by the lack of car traffic. In fact, the reverse has happened and now they are proud to be part of a slow city.

MJ: How is a Slow City different from a fast one?

SC: We have different priorities. We’re interested in technology that helps rather than hurts the environment. We are interested in safe-guarding the production of unique foods and wines that contribute to the character of this region. And primarily, we are focused on sustainable development.

MJ: Are there connections between food, lifestyle, and politics that exist in Europe but do not in America?

SC: In Italy, we take time to eat. We’ll sit at the table at least once a day. The American way of life, in the eyes of Italian people, is too consumerist. Always buy, buy, buy! But there are some things you can’t buy: tranquility, the beauty of your local landscape, friendship, kindness. Italians are conscious of this difference. Even look at our hospitals: In Orvieto, you can be treated even if you don’t have enough money to pay the fees.

MJ: Does this mean American cities don’t stand much chance of becoming Slow?

SC: No. Improving the quality of life must be the goal of every Mayor, whether in Europe or in America. It’s very simple: healthy food makes happy citizens and that is good politics.

I believe Slow Cities will be very successful in the US. The movement is growing very fast. We almost can’t keep up! There are already 63 Slow Cities around the world and we are preparing the entry of cities from the UK, Australia, Germany, Scandinavia, and the US into the Citta Slow organization.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate