Davis Strikes Back

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.




In a televised speech Tuesday night, Governor Gray Davis lashed out against the Republican-backed drive to oust him. Davis asked Californians to fight against the “right wing power grab” that threatens “lasting damage to our state, our environment and the very fabric of our democracy.” Davis characterized the recall as another GOP scheme to steal elections that Republicans wouldn’t otherwise be able to win (remember Florida?).

Davis acknowledged some of his political mistakes Tuesday night, although he told Californians that he had simply inherited the state’s energy and budget crisis. So far, his campaign to defeat the recall has been low-key. Davis has been trying to sell himself as Mr. pious, chugging along in faithful service to the state. It sounds good, but columnist Jennifer Nelson points out in the San Francisco Chronicle that Davis’s priorities have always put public policy second:

“After spending his first term in office doing nothing but raising money, Davis now wants the public to believe that he intends to focus on the people’s business. ‘Whether I have 64 days or three and a half years, I will spend virtually all of my time on the state’s priorities,’ he said last week during a visit to Chicago.

Gee, why was our governor out of the state, you ask? Was he meeting with bond officials to convince them to raise California’s downgraded credit rating? Was he meeting with Illinois officials to find out how that state wooed a major employer like Boeing to the Prairie State?

No, not our governor. He was in Chicago to ask labor leaders to give him millions of dollars to fight the voters’ recall.”

Such political blunders don’t bode well for a governor whose approval ratings are sinking fast. But fans of Arnold Schwarzenegger’s campaign couldn’t be happier — they see this as the prime opportunity to turn the terminator into the governator. Recent polls show Schwarzenegger in the lead, ahead of hundreds of other recall contestants. Adam Sparks of the Chronicle thinks that despite the state’s Democratic leanings, Californians find Schwarzenegger’s hearty laugh and foreign accent to be more important than his political qualifications.

Many commentators agree that most of the recall campaigns are not about to win political strategy awards. Attorney and academic, Kenneth P. Miller, argues in the Los Angeles Times that Latinos could also benefit from a better recall strategy. Miller is critical of the many Latino groups who have been focusing their energies on postponing the recall. These groups argue that all elections should be postponed until the state can replace all punchcard voting machines. Such machines have been blamed for the 2000 presidential election scandal in Florida. Miller argues that since the punchcard machines have not caused a problem in California, Latinos should choose a different battle, and work on registering immigrants who could help elect Cruz Bustamante as the state’s first Latino governor.

“If voters decide to recall Gov. Gray Davis, Bustamante has a great advantage in the race to succeed him. As Republicans split their votes, the lieutenant governor will probably win the lion’s share of the Democratic vote. That should be enough for him to overcome even a strong showing by Schwarzenegger.

Why should Latino advocacy groups continue to seize on relatively inconsequential legal claims and thereby possibly forestall the election of a Latino governor? Is it residual loyalty to Davis, a certain ambivalence toward Bustamante or something else?”

Miller also wonders if the “something else” might just be fear of Proposition 54, otherwise known as the Racial Privacy Initiative. It’s a piece of legislation appearing on the recall ballot that would limit the ability of public institutions to gather and use information about a person’s race or ethnicity. Latino and other minority organizations strongly oppose the measure. Beating it could be their real priority.

Good strategy or not, Vicki Haddock writes in the Chronicle, that the recall might be one of those political/media trainwrecks that people just can’t look away from:

“The recall draws cameras from E!, ‘Access Hollywood’ and Hong Kong Phoenix Satellite. It’s as if the election were ‘The People’s Choice Awards – Sacramento.’ TV news operations are treating the story as a combo O.J./Monica Lewinsky and Princess Di. One TV reporter said he’d covered more political stories in the last two weeks than in the preceding five years.

Whether the frenzy will last and whether it will draw hordes to the polls aren’t sure bets, but nobody’s yawning and flipping channels yet.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate