Pipes-Schemes

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.




Congress has been out on recess for little more than a week, and already, Bush has been sneaking in and pushing his agenda through on the sly. This time, the leader of our democracy is sidestepping Congress to put a friend of his with a reputation as an anti-Muslim and an extremist, Daniel Pipes, into the US Institute of Peace — a federally funded think tank dedicated to promoting peace.

Christopher Hitchens, writing for Slate, slams Pipes as “dangerous and unreliable.” Hitchens points out Pipes’ blatantly racist comments towards Palestinians, and cites Commentary magazine’s February 2003 issue in which Pipes attacked road map proposals and used the words “the so-called Palestinian refugees” and what Hitchens calls other “crude tricks of language” to imply there had been no Palestinian disposession.

Mother Jones’ Michael Scherer notes that Pipes sees no need for diplomacy, compromise, or even negotation:

“Like many other Middle East scholars, Daniel Pipes sees a way to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But unlike most of his peers, Pipes sees no room for negotiation, no hope for compromise and no use for diplomacy. ‘What war had achieved for Israel,’ Pipes explained at a recent Zionist conference in Washington DC, ‘diplomacy has undone.’

His solution is simple: The Israeli military must force what Pipes describes as a ‘change of heart’ by the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza — a sapping of the Palestinian will to fight which will lead to a complete surrender. ‘How is a change of heart achieved? It is achieved by an Israeli victory and a Palestinian defeat,’ Pipes continued. ‘The Palestinians need to be defeated even more than Israel needs to defeat them.'”

Scherer notes that Pipes’ extreme views put him at odds with the Bush administration and its stated policies towards the Israeli-Palestinian conflict — i.e. the “road mad” for peace. As a result, Bush’s nomination of Pipes to a peace-promoting thinktank took many by surprise.

Lawmakers, however, weren’t going to let Pipes slide quietly into his seat. After Bush nominated Pipes to the board of directors in April, several senators managed to stall the vote at the Senate’s Health, Education, Labor, and Pension Committee in late July.

But their triumph was short lived. According to Reuters, Bush is expected to bypass Pipes’ Senate confirmation through a technique called a recess appointment. The technique, though questionable, is constitutional and has long been used by Presidents to appoint nominees sans Senate confirmation. According to Slate’s Michael Brus, Clinton used a recess appointment to designate James Hormel, an openly homosexual man who was none too popular with the conservative right, as ambassador to Luxembourg. Even President John F. Kennedy used it to appoint Thurgood Marshall to the bench during a Congressional recess because he thought that Southern senators might block Marshall’s nomination. Presidents have also been known to use recess appointments to delay a congressional vote until after elections when the nominee faces a friendlier Congress.

So what does this mean for Pipes? It means that Pipes’ recess appointment will be valid until the next Congress is sworn in — which could be as late as 2005.

Lawmakers along with Muslim, Arab, and liberal Jewish groups are lambasting Bush’s scheme and his nominee. According to the AP Senator Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts thinks the Bush administration can do better:

“‘I continue to believe that Dr. Pipes is not the right person for this position,’ said Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., in a statement issued Tuesday. ‘His record and experience do not reflect a commitment to bridging differences and preventing conflict. Surely the administration can find someone better to serve on the Board of the United States Institute of Peace.'”

In a press release by the Council on American-Islamic Relations, one expert argues that Bush’s move is offensive to advocates of peace and undermines democracy:

“‘This back-door move by the president is a defeat for democracy and an affront to all those who seek peace,’ said CAIR Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper. ‘Pipes’ appointment calls into question all of President Bush’s previous statements claiming that the war on terrorism is not an attack on Islam and shows total distain for the democratic process.'”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate