Tour de Farce

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.




President Bush got a little sweaty Friday while shoveling dirt and defending his environmental record in the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area. In addition to tidying-up trails and restoring native plants, Bush took the opportunity to crow about his administration’s commitment to National Parks. The California stint is part of a mini-environmental tour, during which Bush will stop in four Western states (California, Arizona, Oregon, and Washington) to tout his environmental accomplishments and aspirations.

The tour appropriately kicked off last week by a burnt hillside in Summerhaven, Arizona, an area devastated by the June Aspen fire. Bush used this visit to build support for HR1904, the Healthy Forests Restoration Act, which the Senate Agriculture Committee approved in July. Put simply, the act rests on the premise that the best way to ensure the health of our forests is to cut them down. The New York Times writes:

“On its face, the plan seems innocent enough. It would increase the Forest Service’s fire-prevention budget and presumably the service’s ability to stop fires before they happen by aggressively thinning overgrown forests and deliberately setting controlled fires to prevent even bigger blazes. The problem with the plan is that it is hopelessly, perhaps deliberately, vague. It does not specifically require that the money be spent where it would obviously do the most good, at the urbanized edges of the forests, where homeowners and their property are most at risk. Indeed, its mandate is so broad that it practically invites commercial logging on millions of acres in remote areas of the national forests, where fires pose little or no threat to people or property but where the trees are the biggest and the opportunities for profit are the largest.”

The tour comes on the heels of Bush’s recent selection of Utah Governor Mike Leavitt to head the Environmental Protection Agency. Bush’s emphasis on environmental issues this month has opened him up to attacks from opponents. Of the Healthy Forests Initiative Senator Joseph Lieberman (R-CT) said, “Unlike our first president, George Bush just can’t come clean about his plan to cut down trees. He’s using the real need to clear brush and small trees from our forests as an excuse for a timber industry giveaway. Arizonans should make no mistake: this is logging industry greed masquerading as environmental need.”

It’s also a case of logging industry personnel masquerading as government officials. As part of his speech in Arizona, Bush commended Secretary of Agriculture, Ann Veneman for the “fabulous job” she’s done to protect America’s forests. Nevermind that as a lawyer, Veneman represented the Sierra Nevada Access Multiple-Use & Stewardship Coalition, an association of logging, mining, and off-road vehicle interests pushing to roll back protections for wilderness and wildlife.

Governor Howard Dean of Vermont echoed Lieberman, saying “When it comes to the environment, no amount of glitz can disguise the administration’s dismal record of championing corporate interests over sound science and environmental stewardship.”

Bush’s visit to the Santa Monica Mountains was a brief respite from two days of fruitful fundraising — Bush raised $2 million in less than 24 hours from supportive Californians. Posing among the chaparral shrubs, Bush pledged to make good on his campaign promise to reduce the $4.9 billion maintenance backlog crippling the National Parks. According to Gale Norton, the administration has already reduced the backlog by $2.9 billion, but the National Parks Conservation Association (NPCA) sites $370 million as the more accurate figure. Thomas C. Kiernan, NPCA president, released the following statement:

“It’s a shame the president’s national park visit today to Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area is little more than a photo opportunity, offering spin over substance, instead of real progress for our national parks. Although the president pledged to eliminate the maintenance and resource-protection backlog of the national parks, the administration has supplied little new funding, mostly shuffling existing park dollars already stretched too thin. As a result, Department of Interior estimates show that although several projects have been completed, the overall backlog remains essentially unchanged. Yet the president and the administration still claim to be on track to meet the backlog pledge. Visiting any park or talking with any Park Service ranger will yield a different conclusion.”

Later this month, Bush plans to visit the Deschutes National Forest in Bend, Oregon, to further build support for his Healthy Forests Initiative. After that, he’ll swing by Seattle to talk about Salmon, 33,000 of which died in Oregon’s Klamath Basin in 2002, in part due to his administration’s water policy.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate