Fighting for the Down and Out(sourced)

One state legislator attempts to stanch the flow of jobs abroad.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


State senator Shirley
K. Turner’s stolid storefront office in Ewing, New Jersey—with its photos of kittens taped
to the wall and Dr. Seuss books piled in the waiting area—hardly resembles ground zero of
a fast-moving political firestorm. Nor is the Democratic senator, dressed in a conservative
blue-knit sweater set, the picture of a rabble-rouser. But in 2002, after learning that a company
hired by the New Jersey Department of Human Services to field calls from welfare recipients about
their benefits had itself subcontracted the job to a firm in India, she introduced a bill to prohibit
the state from outsourcing jobs to other countries. “I was outraged. Here we are in New Jersey, as
we are in every state, requiring welfare recipients to go to work,” she says. “And yet, we were sending
these jobs overseas…so that corporations can make more money.”

Fortune 500 companies from Amazon.com to American Express have already
exported millions of jobs; and, by 2015, 3.3 million U.S. service-industry jobs and $136 billion
in wages are expected to make the exodus abroad. Nor is the public sector immune. It is
estimated that by 2008, cash-strapped state and local governments will outsource some $23 billion
in information-technology work to foreign countries.

In the case that sparked Turner, eFunds Corp.—contracted to
handle welfare-benefit calls in 19 states including New Jersey—moved its phone bank from
Wisconsin, where workers earned $12 to $14 an hour, to Bombay, where the hourly wage is $2 to $3.

State governments’ recent efforts to outsource are “just bad public
policy,” says Turner. When people are unemployed, she notes, they don’t pay taxes, and the loss
of that tax revenue contributes to already skyrocketing budget deficits. “It’s like shooting
yourself in the foot,” she says. “We need revenue, and we get it from tax dollars when people work.”
Turner adds that whatever the savings to government, outsourcing has hidden costs, such as increased
unemployment benefits. Government doesn’t have the luxury that corporations do of walking away
from those it has fired, she says. “Government has to be there to pick up the pieces.”

Outsourcing is just the latest manifestation of the rush to privatize
government jobs, which, she says, New Jersey has taken too far. “When this privatization thing
started, we were told that we were going to get a better quality of performance for a cheaper price.
We have found the exact opposite.” As the service deteriorates and the costs escalate, Turner adds,
the public pays the price. “They have taken it to a new level by chasing cheap labor overseas. It is
really a race to the bottom and it is never going to end.”

The Senate unanimously passed Turner’s anti-outsourcing bill at the
end of 2002; but it faced strong opposition from corporate lobbyists and never made it to the full
Assembly. Business interests may have killed her bill, but they couldn’t stop its momentum. Turner
heard from more than 2,000 citizens nationwide, including workers whose own jobs had been outsourced.
“The fax machines were literally going 24 hours a day,” says Turner, who has been quoted in 90 different
publications, hailed as a hero by CNN’s Lou Dobbs, and approached by television programs from as
far away as Japan.

Bowing to the negative publicity, eFunds relocated its Bombay call
center last spring, not just back to the United States but to Camden, one of New Jersey’s poorest
cities. “Her effect has been to put the issue on the table,” says Scott Kirwin, founder of Information
Technology Professionals Association of America. Legislators in 15 other states have introduced
similar bills, he says, “all because of Shirley Turner. Shirley Turner was the first, and I know
she is not going to be the last.”

Turner takes pride in the Camden deal and the wide ripple effect she’s
already had. Reintroducing her bill was her first order of business when the new session commenced
in January. Sitting calmly between the U.S. and state flags, the senator declares that protecting
American jobs should be a top national priority. But she’s also realistic about the future of outsourcing.
“You can’t stop it, but it needs to be slowed,” she says. That’s why during her day job as a career adviser
at Rider University in Lawrenceville, she urges students to “think ahead of the curve.”

“You have to prepare yourself for multiple careers,” Turner tells them.
“There is no such thing anymore as job security.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate