Justice DeLayed

Long overdue, Tom DeLay’s day of reckoning draws nearer.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Ask not for whom the bell tolls, Tom Delay, because … well, OK, the bell isn’t tolling for Tom DeLay — not yet. Despite a steady drip-drip of allegations of improper conduct brought against the House majority leader, despite hints of dirty financing and whispers of bribery, the House ethics committee has yet to launch a proper investigation into DeLay’s doings. But that’s all set to change.

On Wednesday, Rep. Chris Bell (D-TX) filed a full-blown ethics complaint against DeLay. Bell’s is the first formal complaint filed by a lawmaker against a House leader since 1997, when an ethics probe forced then-Speaker Newt Gingrich to resign from the House (Gingrich admitted to misleading investigators about his use of tax-exempt organizations to fund political activities). The seven-year post-Gingrich truce has slowly fractured after months of heavy pressure from Congressional watchdogs citing mounting evidence of Republican wrongdoing. Witness a grand jury investigation of DeLay.

The official tally against Tom DeLay contains three major grievances. For starters, officials from Kansas-based Westar Energy claimed (via a leaked memo) to have dished out $56,000 into GOP campaigns in exchange for a few energy legislation favors from DeLay and Rep. Billy Tauzin (R-LA). This alleged bit of naughtiness has triggered a full FEC investigation. On top of that, Austin-based prosecutors are currently investigating whether DeLay’s self-started political action committee, TRMPAC, illegally laundered corporate donations into local GOP campaigns. Finally, Bell complains that DeLay “improperly used his office” when the Texan ordered the FAA to hunt down state Democrats who had fled Austin, in order to hold up the DeLay-sponsored gerrymandering. (The Texas state legislature had crafted a redistricting plan designed to dilute the influence of millions of minority voters.)

It’s a lengthy list, and a good start; but why stop there? The dirt on DeLay reaches far and wide. Herewith a sampling:

  • His alleged use of a children’s charity to raise money for posh RNC parties. (Needless to say, illegal. And, honestly, a children’s charity? Tom DeLay?)

  • His request in March that the Treasury Department analyze John Kerry’s tax plan. (Federal law prohibits civil servants in the Treasury from working for a campaign while on duty.)

  • His grossly improper collaboration with his brother, a lobbyist, to push through key environmental legislation, as first reported by Mother Jones in 1996.

    An ethics probe on DeLay is long overdue. Democrats should not waver from pressing the investigation, even if Republicans have threatened to retaliate, as the Washington Post reports:

    A DeLay ally, Rep. John T. Doolittle (R-Calif.), said Republicans “are going to have to respond in kind” by filing ethics charges against key Democrats. From now on, he said in an interview, it’s a matter of “you kill my dog, I’ll kill your cat.” Doolittle said he plans to file ethics charges against a prominent Democrat but would not name the target.

    This is no idle threat. But as Robert Kuttner reported in a March issue of The American Prospect, Republicans hardly need to resort to underhanded measures; they’ve already given themselves a virtual monopoly of power in the House. What more do they want?:

    Republican parliamentary gimmickry has emasculated legislative opposition in the House of Representatives … House Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas has both intimidated moderate Republicans and reduced the minority party to window dressing, rather like the token opposition parties in Mexico during the six-decade dominance of the PRI.

    As things stand, the Democrats have almost nothing left to lose. It’s high time, then, that they start fighting back.

  • WE'LL BE BLUNT

    It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

    The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

    Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

    The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

    Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

    And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

    Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

    If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

    payment methods

    WE'LL BE BLUNT

    It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

    The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

    Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

    The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

    Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

    And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

    Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

    If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

    payment methods

    We Recommend

    Latest

    Sign up for our free newsletter

    Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

    Get our award-winning magazine

    Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

    Subscribe

    Support our journalism

    Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

    Donate