The Unhappy Majority

Beneath the partisan divide, America is discontented and desperate for change.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Voters remain deadlocked in a partisan divide over which candidate to support, but this split is not indicative of the bipartisan discontent felt by most Americans, a new national poll by Mother Jones reveals*. Nearly two thirds of American voters say the country is “on the wrong track” and most — including a majority of independents and even many moderate Republicans — believe that they are personally worse off than three years ago on a broad range of issues, from their tax burden and job opportunities to their access to quality health care and schools. This “discontent gap” between party loyalty and the issues indicates a strategic opening for a candidate who promises real change.

In line with other national surveys, the Mother Jones poll shows President George W. Bush and Senator John Kerry locked in a statistical dead heat, with Ralph Nader supported by five percent of registered voters. But the Mother Jones poll probed deeper than approval ratings and tracking questions, asking respondents if their own lives had improved on more than a dozen fronts since Bush took office. The poll also asked voters to identify who they saw as the “winners” and “losers” of the last three years.

Change Wanted

The results indicate a startling consensus on the need for change. Asked if the country should “continue in the same direction as the one Bush is headed or a significantly different one,” 57 percent of Americans at large, 57 percent of swing state voters, and 67 percent of independents said they want a different course. Although the vast majority of Republicans remain loyal to Bush — nearly 90 percent say they would support the president over Kerry — the poll found that 34 percent of moderate Republicans, as well as 24 percent of those who voted for Bush in 2000, now want a change of direction for the country.

A majority of registered voters from across the political spectrum, including many of the President’s core voters, said they believe the poor, the middle class, and American workers have lost ground over the past three years, while the wealthy, big corporations, and CEO’s have gained.

Perhaps most importantly, independent voters — a group that regularly affects the outcome of presidential elections — appear to be distancing themselves from President Bush’s conservative Republican base on a wide range of issues. “Their underlying dispositions right now look like they seem to favor Kerry,” says Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center.

Iraq

The discontent divide is particularly acute on Iraq. Despite the removal of Saddam Hussein, only 39 percent of all respondents identified the Iraqi people as having gained ground over the last three years. The war is the leading concern for Democrats and independent voters alike (44 and 34 percent, respectively), while Republicans cite the state of America’s moral values as the most pressing issue (32 percent). Similarly, when asked to choose between two statements on the Iraq war — “The Iraq war is a good investment in our security” and “The Iraq war is making it harder to meet our needs at home” — a large majority of Democrats and independents said the latter assessment best matched their own.

Even among Republicans, support for the war is less solid than it may first appear. While 60 percent of all Republicans have positive feelings about the war, only 45 percent of liberal and moderate Republicans say the same. Less than half of moderate Republicans said the war has been a wise investment in our national security. And only 51 percent of moderate Republicans see the Iraqi people as coming out of the last three years as “winners.”

The Economy

On the economic front, a significant majority of all respondents said both they and the nation at large were worse off in regards to job security, the availability of good-paying jobs, the gap between wages and expenses, and access to health care.

Despite three massive tax cuts championed by the president, only 29 percent of all respondents said their tax burden was better. And while nearly 60 percent of conservative Republicans said their tax situation had improved, only 38 percent of moderate and liberal Republicans agreed, a number more in line with liberal Democrats (17 percent), conservative Democrats (14 percent), and independents (16 percent).

Furthermore, while 60 percent of conservative Republicans said the middle class has gained under Bush, only 41 percent of more moderate Republicans share that view. Finally, like Democrats and independents, three quarters of moderate Republicans said big corporations have emerged as winners thanks to Bush.

“This is the most dramatic evidence I have seen that the public perceives a Bush administration tilt towards the wealthy and away from middle and lower income Americans,” said Benjamin Page, a political scientist at Northwestern University. “If that were true on election day, Bush would be in deep trouble.”

The Bush Base

The only people who seem uniformly pleased with the direction of the country are conservative Republicans and devout evangelical Christians, for whom the war remains largely popular, and in whose eyes Iraqis have gained ground. There is significant crossover between the two groups, and evangelicals remain the most committed element of Bush’s support: More than 75 percent have warm feelings toward him, versus 25 percent for Kerry.

Nearly three-quarters of devout evangelicals believe that Bush has lived up to his promise to govern as a compassionate conservative — a view held by only 42 percent of all respondents — and two-thirds of evangelicals say they are confident their children will have a chance to lead a better life than their own, something less than half of all respondents believe.

But Can Kerry Swing?

It is far too early to tell whether the broad public dissatisfaction seen in the poll will hurt Bush come Election Day. There seems to be real disagreement between conservative and more moderate Republicans, but thus far Kerry has failed to capitalize on the GOP split. While only 59 percent of Republican voters said they strongly support the direction the president has chosen, only 10 percent of Republicans who do not now support Kerry said there was a chance that they would change their mind and vote for him. Among independent voters not committed to Kerry, 19 percent said there was a fair or small chance that they would vote for him.

“Even if you grant that the right track/wrong track numbers aren’t in the President’s favor right now, Senator Kerry hasn’t shown that he is the leader to take the country on the right track,” says Republican pollster Jon McHenry. Kerry officials, meanwhile, see the poll results as cause for optimism. “The president is the best-known politician in the land. It takes time for people to learn who John Kerry is,” says Mark Mellman, a pollster for the Kerry campaign, who contends that recent poll numbers could be disastrous for the president. Kerry could further benefit if his campaign can convince more Americans to vote. While the president and Kerry are essentially tied among likely voters, Kerry holds a 14-point edge among respondents who said they were registered, but unlikely to vote.

The widespread dissatisfaction with the nation’s direction reflects the findings of several other recent surveys. A May poll by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press found 61 percent of voters dissatisfied with the nation’s direction, an increase from just 47 percent last December, and a Los Angeles Times poll conducted last week found three-fifths of Americans believe the nation is on the wrong track.

“No president has ever been reelected with that many people thinking the country is moving in the wrong direction,” said Mellman, Kerry’s pollster. Bush supporters may take some solace from the fact that Bill Clinton’s approval ratings were just as bad in July 1996, and he went on to win by a landslide.

The difference, however, is that Clinton’s poll numbers were already on an upswing and continued to rise as the economy improved and dissatisfaction with his early policies faded. By contrast, Bush’s popularity has been declining along with support for the invasion of Iraq, and despite signs that the economy is picking up speed. Supporters of Senator Kerry hope that this trend continues through election day.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate