The Who’s Better Off Game:Healthcare Workers

Federal officials confidently predict that 3.5 million new healthcare jobs will be created by 2012, a far-higher-than-average growth rate of 28 percent. But there is a gray lining to this silver cloud: Hospitals, which account for nearly 40 percent of all healthcare employment, are continuously scaling back…

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The Bureau of Labor Statistics has a clean-sounding explanation for the downsizing that’s hit hospital in dozens of states over the last four years, calling it “a result of efforts to control hospital costs and of the increasing utilization of outpatient clinics and other alternative care sites.” Hospital workers and their unions call it something else — the result of mismanagement, greed, and federal neglect. Facing growing pressures to turn big profits and shrinking Medicare and Medicaid payments, hospitals are lurching into crisis, workers insist.

Whatever the cause, the effects are clear: From Long Island to Miami, Philadelphia to Oakland, hospitals have eliminated hundreds of thousands of jobs. Even with the nation in the midst of a nursing shortage, with hospitals in California, Ohio and elsewhere adding nursing jobs, job security remains bleak. That’s especially true in Florida. In the summer of 2000, there were 149,060 registered nurses working in Florida hospitals. By the summer of 2003, that number had plummeted to 131,260, a drop of more than 10 percent. Nurses in Illinois have been hit with an economic double-whammy. Not only are there fewer hospital jobs for registered nurses, but real income has dropped. Adjusted for inflation, registered nurses’ wages in Illinois actually fell by about .3 percent between 2000 and 2003.

Support workers, among the lowest-paid hospital employees, have been hit particularly hard. In Pennsylvania, for instance, more than 4,000 housekeeping jobs have disappeared since 2000. And there has been little if any growth in wages. While housekeeping workers across the nation saw incomes increase by about 1.6 percent between 2000 and 2003, workers in many states, like Florida and Michigan, saw only meager gains of about .3 to .5 percent.

Among all hospital workers, there is one group that has gained in just about every way — managers. True, job growth has been modest — just 1 percent nationwide. But wages have accelerated at an industry-best rate. Adjusted for inflation, medical managers are earning nearly 10 percent more today than they were in 2000.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate