Every (Offshore) Vote Counts

Both parties are looking for votes everywhere they can — even outside the country.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Since the 2000 presidential election, both parties have stressed the notion that every vote counts. As a result, get-out-the-vote efforts have stretched beyond America’s borders, targeting U.S. citizens living overseas.

Reaching out to expatriate voters is an inexact science. Without census data, the number of American citizens living overseas is estimated anywhere from four million to ten million. While the largest ex-pat communities reside in Mexico, Canada and Great Britain, there are no hard statistics about the expat population’s demographic breakdown or how many are eligible to vote.

But one thing Republicans, Democrats and independent observers agree on is that the parties are actively reaching out to those voters more than ever. The Calgary Herald reports more than 340,000 absentee ballots have already been requested by Americans overseas, compared with a total of about 250,000 four years ago, and absentee requests historically increase closer to Election Day. As Kerry supporter Anne Jayne – now living in Calgary but eligible to vote in Virginia – said:

“There is a lot of interest in this election. And there is a lot of interest in voting. People want to vote this time around.

“Americans, wherever they live, are affected by the U.S. government. I care about things like jobs, education, health, because I have family there. Who is in the White House profoundly affects everyone.”

Republicans have credited overseas votes with handing George Bush the White House, as Al Gore had a 202-vote lead in Florida before those votes were counted, and Bush led by 537 afterward. The organization Republicans Abroad now has chapters in 50 countries, and the likes of Karl Rove, Jeb Bush, Arnold Schwarzenegger and even Dan Quayle have stumped overseas for the GOP. As Ryan King of Republicans Abroad told the Washington Post:

“People are motivated. You have people literally coming out of the woodwork to register. This is a very contentious, personal election. People really feel that it’s going to affect them personally.”

Not to be outdone, Democrats Abroad now has chapters in 73 countries (up from 30 in 2000), including the “Donkeys in the Desert” chapter in Iraq. Those efforts have received a boost from Diana Kerry, John’s multilingual sister, who has already campaigned for her brother in Mexico, Canada, Great Britain, France, Austria, Germany and Ireland. Newspaper accounts cite expat Democrats who haven’t voted in decades but plan to change that this year. Susan Mullen, a U.S. citizen living in British Columbia, told the B.C. Times Colonist she’s seen evidence of that trend:

“People like me know how we’re perceived in the world, because we’re living in it. We’re seeing the damage being done to the image of the U.S. We need a change in administration so we can reach out to the world again, because the guys we’ve got now are just not going to do it.

“I hadn’t really planned on getting into any of this. When I came up from Washington state five years ago, I just knew that I wanted to continue to vote. But I wanted to do more than that this year, because it’s so important.”

The goal for Democrats is to cut into the typical Republican advantage among overseas votes which, according to the International Herald Tribune, usually comes to about 3-to-1 thanks to the military vote. The Electoral College only complicates things, as overseas votes are counted in the voter’s home state, regardless of how long ago they lived there, and there’s no effective way to target swing-state expat voters. But voters are clearly taking more of an interest this year. As Amsterdam-based American Claire Taylor told the Herald Tribune:

“People here were feeling very frustrated and very helpless about what was happening in Iraq. But now, they can do something.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate