Congress Back in (In)action

Congress reconvenes this week, with intelligence reform just one item on a packed agenda.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Intelligence reform will no doubt dominate
discussions on Capitol Hill now that Congress has
returned for a crammed 27-day session. But both the
Senate and House have crowded plates before their
planned Oct. 1 adjournment.

The Senate, in particular, faces a daunting task on appropriations
bills. Twelve of 13 bills haven’t been voted
on yet in the Senate, while the House still has three
appropriations-bill votes pending. Just the sheer
volume of that work virtually ensures it won’t get
done on time, as The Hill reports:

“Capitol Hill leaders have already voiced skepticism that the entire process — including the conferences to iron out any differences between the Senate and House versions of each appropriations bill — will be completed in September. Some even go further, saying the process could continue into the next year.”

In the meantime, Republicans plan to use the deadline-driven session to deemphasize this outstanding work, instead introducing some politically polarizing legislation. As the New York Times reports, that includes a string of dubious wedge proposals. There’s the always-popular constitutional amendment against flag-burning, which has repeatedly failed in the Senate despite passing the House. The House plans to vote on a constitutional ban against gay marriage, a proposal the Senate shot down in August. And, the GOP House leaders want to pass a law prohibiting courts from hearing challenges to the Pledge of Allegiance (wonder how the Supreme Court will rule on that one). Minority Leader Tom Daschle is showing little patience for the Republicans’ strategy:

“We should be dealing with the security of the American people, and the Republicans appear to be poised to use the remaining time to score political points.”

But that’s not all. Tom DeLay wants to pass a resolution highlighting the “successes of the war on terror,” an inherently worthless piece of legislation designed to keep Sept. 11 alive as a campaign issue. As the Hill explained:

The resolution will address the nation’s success in routing the Taliban in Afghanistan and its accomplishments in capturing and killing al Qaeda operatives, thwarting terrorist plans, toppling Saddam Hussein and introducing democracy to Iraq.

“‘It will go through a whole litany of successes of the war made necessary by the attacks of 9-11,’ said Stuart Roy, spokesman for DeLay.

This is what Congress plans to waste time on instead of the aforementioned appropriations bills. There’s also the long-debated highway bill, which President Bush has promised to veto if it costs more than $256 million, leaving Congress with a mandate to trim. And Congress is going to have to handle the political hot potato of tax cuts, as the Los Angeles Times points out:

Continuing disagreements within the Republican majority dog plans to extend three of President Bush’s tax cuts. Some Republicans are eager to give the president a victory on an issue for his re-election campaign.

Yet voting to extend the cuts — an increase in tax credit for families with children, an expansion in the number of taxpayers in the lowest 10 percent tax bracket and relief for married couples — poses a challenge for those in both parties who have been trying to rein in the deficit by insisting on offsets for tax cuts and spending.

Clearly, there’s enough for both houses to contend with – even after the expected and needed debate on intelligence reform – for DeLay’s tactics to cause voter outrage. With more than 50 percent of voters already disapproving of congressional performance, the L.A. Times notes:

“If the coming session does not go beyond such political gestures, the 108th Congress will have a slender record to show for this year. And polls show voters have noticed.”

Congress has 57 days to do something about it.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate