The Next Florida Could Be … Florida

Outstanding lawsuits, allegations of fraud, uneven standards for voting. Will history repeat itself in the 2004 election?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Plenty of states — from New Mexico to Oregon to Nevada — are contending with possible voter fraud, ballot challenges and hard questions about vote-counting. But the “next Florida” might just turn out to be, well, Florida.

Less than a month before election day, the state already had to deal with a lawsuit seeking to require paper trails for electronic voting machines, among its litany of potential problems. Now, as the Miami Herald reports, the Florida Supreme Court has agreed to hear a lawsuit filed by a group of unions that seeks to let voters cast provisional ballots anywhere in their county.

Created in 2001 as a safeguard for citizens left off the voter rolls, provisional ballots are used by voters not listed on the rolls and only counted if the voter’s omission is deemed erroneous. However, as the Herald explains:

“The caveat added by state legislators is that provisional ballots must be discarded if the voter didn’t go to the right precinct. Lawyers for the unions say this violates Florida’s Constitution, which requires only that voters cast their ballots in their home county. In a state that has been ravaged by four hurricanes, they also say that many precincts may be changed due to damages at polling places.”

Ron Labasky of the Florida State Association of Supervisors of Elections told the Herald letting voters cast such ballots anywhere could be a logistical nightmare, and would also open the door to voters in counties that use touch-screen machines instead requesting provisional ballots they can cast elsewhere.

Elsewhere, lame-duck Palm Beach County election supervisor Theresa LePore is also facing a lawsuit. Filed on public-records grounds, the goal is to obtain copies of voter registration applications rejected by LePore’s office. The voter-registration group America’s Families United had asked for the copies in July, and Tuesday’s lawsuit by the Washington-based Advancement Project is following up on the request. As the Palm Beach Post reports, the point is to see why these applications were rejected, and whether applicants’ failure to check a box declaring their citizenship is the reason. LePore responded that state law lets the public examine the applications but not make copies, because they can include the applicant’s phone number, Social Security number and driver’s license number.

The “citizenship box” is also the subject of a threatened legal action by the ACLU against Florida Secretary of State Glenda Hood. Hood’s office sent a letter to election supervisors last week, telling them to throw out applications where the box was not checked. The ACLU and others argue that box is unnecessary, as the application also requires a signed “oath” that the applicant is a citizen.

Meanwhile, in Leon County, election officials are looking into some suspicious, photocopied registration forms. As the Tallahassee Democrat reports:

“Leon County received about 1,500 photocopied voter registrations, mostly from Florida A&M University and nearby black neighborhoods. The overwhelming majority registered as Republicans, which made Elections Supervisor Ion Sancho suspicious because the FAMU precincts are lopsidedly Democratic.

“His staff has contacted 36 voters so far, all of whom said they signed color registration forms, not the black-and-gray photocopies forwarded to Sancho. And only one of the 36 said he intended to sign up with the GOP.”

While the alleged fraud could have invalidated the applications, Sancho told the Associated Press he will put these voters on the rolls without party affiliation. But that’s not the only example of fraud. Former St. Petersburg Mayor Charles Schuh told the AP he got a letter saying he was ineligible to vote because his application was late – only to learn later that someone else had turned in a form with his name, address and phone number:

“If I could find the guy I would make sure he was prosecuted for fraud and forgery. They could have stopped me from voting in the primary,” Schuh, an attorney, said Tuesday. “That’s wrong, dead wrong.”

After the 2000 debacle, Florida officials talked a good game about reforming the voting system that rightly drew much criticism. But with all the outstanding lawsuits, fraud allegations and standards radically different from one county to the next, the state could be headed for a repeat without the paper trail for a recount.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate