Senate in the Balance

Who will control the Senate? It’s still up in the air.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


As the Democrats’ quest to regain control of the Senate enters its final days, it should come as no surprise that the latest polls show the most important races — and therefore, control of the chamber — still very much up in the air.

In Alaska, former Gov. Tony Knowles has maintained a narrow lead for months, and polls show him up by 3-5 points on the incumbent Lisa Murkowski. The race there is generating plenty of voter interest, with absentee ballots going out to more than 58,000 voters (compared to 32,000 four years ago) and the Democrats encouraging absentee and early balloting. As political scientist Larry Sabato notes, Bush’s expected landslide in the state has not been able to move the race:

“Nothing has changed, and Knowles is still up. Can Bush rescue Murkowski? We have argued elsewhere that there will be more straight ticket voting and less ticket splitting in this election…But if there is any exception on the map of the United States, it is Alaska, home of exceptionally independent citizens. We’ll see what the final surveys say, but Murkowski has never been able to overcome the nepotism charge, and her governor-father is more unpopular than ever.”

In North Carolina, John Edwards hasn’t been able to boost Erskine Bowles’ bid for the seat he’s vacating. While Bowles had a semi-comfortable lead early in the summer, the race is now statistically tied, with Burr getting a $3 million boost this week from the National Republican Senatorial Committee. That money has helped launch a series of ads attacking Bowles on immigration. Still, the former Clinton chief of staff is polling ahead of Kerry in the state, and the race is far from over.

In South Carolina, Inez Tenenbaum continues to trail Jim DeMint despite the GOP frontrunner’s continued gaffes. However, strange comments on the campaign trail have proven problematic for Kentucky incumbent Jim Bunning (whose lead is down to one point in the most recent poll) and Oklahoma’s Tom Coburn (who holds a margin-of-error lead over Democrat Brad Carson). Both Bunning and Coburn are running well behind Bush in their states.

Despite its status as solidly pro-Bush, Louisiana has never sent a Republican to the Senate. That state’s most recent tracking poll shows Republican David Vitter with a majority of votes. There’s no doubt Vitter will gain the most votes on Tuesday against two Democrats, but he needs to fare better than 50 percent to avoid a runoff. As the Lafayette Advertiser notes, Vitter “should not celebrate yet” as Democrats historically break late in Louisiana. Examples include frontrunner Bobby Jindal losing the 2003 governor’s race after a double-digit lead, and Mary Landrieu rebounding to win a Senate runoff in 2002 despite White House efforts to oust her.

Meanwhile, John Thune has taken a slight lead over Tom Daschle in the latest Zogby poll. The most expensive Senate race in history remains too-close-to-call, as Republican groups nationwide are hitting the other guys’ Senate leader with unprecedented fury.

Then there’s the two tight races in presidential battlegrounds.

Colorado’s Ken Salazar appears to be leading, with a nine-point lead in the most recent Zogby poll — though other recent polls have shown a more narrow gap. The outcome of this race could easily swing based on the outcome of Bush/Kerry in Colorado, where the once-red state is still up for grabs. Salazar, with a track record of getting out the vote, could also benefit from the massive numbers of new voters in Colorado.

In Florida, Zogby has the most recent numbers, which have Mel Martinez beating Betty Castor within the margin of error. This one, too, will probably come down to which party has better get-out-the vote in the swing state. As Sabato points out, odds are “it will be either a Bush/Martinez victory, or a Kerry/Castor party on election night.”

Democrat Denise Majette is gaining in new polls, but probably not enough to make the Georgia race competitive. And in Illinois, Barack Obama remains solidly in the driver’s seat, with Alan Keyes incredibly polling at less than 20 percent.

With just four days left, what happens in the Senate remains anyone’s guess. Several races will likely come down to how big a margin the presidential candidates win in those states and turnout remains absolutely crucial for both parties.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate