Buy First, Fly Later

“Don’t test, don’t tell” at the Pentagon

Illustration By: <a href="http://lobrow-illustration.com" target="new">Erik T. Johnson / lobrow-illustration.com</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Buy Now, Fly Later

“Don’t test, don’t tell” at the Pentagon


For a while, military reformers looked to be winning the battle against costly weapons systems that don’t work. In the 1970s, they scripted a new maxim, “Fly Before You Buy,”
and by the 1980s, they opened a new office in the Pentagon devoted to overseeing weapons testing. But in recent years, the tide has turned; the Pentagon’s own chief weapons tester, Thomas P. Christie,said in March 2004 that major weapons manufacturers are “learning faster how to avoid testing than we are learning to do it better.” And with each missed test, the public foots the bill for weapons that may place soldiers in unnecessary peril.

SYSTEM

COST

TESTING

RESULTS

Stryker Armored Vehicle

$8.7 billion

After purchasing hundreds of these personnel carriers in 2000, the Pentagon discovered that the Stryker’s armor did not protect against rocket-propelled grenades—one of the biggest threats to soldiers in Iraq.

The Army added a 5,000-pound cage around each vehicle, making them top-heavy and obstructing some escape hatches, according to a Pentagon report written after three soldiers aboard Strykers died during a routine Iraq mission.

Hercules C-130J Transport Plane

About $4 billion

The Air Force purchased the C-130J as a commercial, off-the-shelf airplane, even though it was the first of its kind, which meant… no need for much testing.

Pentagon auditors say the planes “cannot perform” intended missions, such as low-altitude night flying; 168 problems with the craft have been reported, many serious enough to cause crashes.

Predator Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

$641 million through 2002

Pentagon testers declared the drone “not operational, effective or suitable” in September 2001.

So far nearly half of the 48 Predators deployed have crashed.

F/A-22 Raptor

$28.7 billion since 1986

Though the Air Force has spent billions to develop this fighter plane since the mid-’80s, official testing began only last year, exposing problems such as electronics that inexplicably shut down.

The Pentagon is ignoring calls for additional testing from congressional auditors, who noted in a recent report that it is not even clear “why this aircraft is needed.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate