Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The wedding industry: Conde Nast Bridal Infobank American Wedding Study, 2002; Roper, 2000; “Wedding & Honeymoon Statistics,”
Top
Wedding Links

Cost of average wedding gift: American Wedding Study, 2002; Gerard J.
Monaghan, President, Association of Bridal Consultants

Expenditure of average wedding guest: Bigda, Carolyn, “Wedding Guests
Can Avoid Shedding Tears over Costs,” October 31, 2004 Chicago
Tribune

GAO marriage benefits: U.S.
Newswire
, “Institute for Marriage and Public Policy: Are
There Over 1000 Federal Marriage Benefits?” May 26, 2004; Gerard J.
Monaghan, President, Association of Bridal Consultants

Bush’s Healthy Marriage Initiative: Kirkpatrick, David; Pear, Robert,
“Bush Plans $1.5 Billion Drive for Promotion of Marriage,”NY
Times
, January 14, 2004; Brezosky, Lynn, “Attorney General Hosts Summits On Helping
Low-Income Families,” Associated Press, October 21, 2004.

Increase in wages and odds of marriage: Carlson, Marcia; England,
Paula; McLanahan, Sara, “Union Formation and Dissolution in Fragile
Families,” November 2002.

Percentage of couples spending more than planned on wedding: Block,
Sandra, “‘Til Debt Do Us Part,”USA
Today
, November 9, 2004.

Cost of average wedding since 1980: Kerr, Robert, “Older Brides,
Bridegrooms See The New Trends Trailing Along,” The Commercial
Appeal
(Memphis), February 9, 1992; “Calendar,” U.S. News &
World Report
, June 6, 1994; BRIDE’s Reader Profile Study, October
1980; Conde Nast Bridal Infobank, 2002; BRIDE’s
Millenium Report: Wedding Love & Money
, 2000.

Percentage of marriages ending within 15 years: “43 Percent of First
Marriages Break Up Within 15 Years,”National
Center for Health Statistics
, May 24, 2001.
; Conde Nast Bridal Infobank American Wedding Study, 2002; Roper, 2000

Divorce in red states vs. blue states: National
Vital Statistics Report
, 2003.
; Census 2000,
U.S. Census Bureau

Most and least wanted gifts in U.K.: Ward, Simon P., “Unwanted
Wedding Gifts,” MSN,
July 19, 2003.

Percentage of couple omitting “obey” from vows and percentage of
brides taking husband’s name: “Weddings Across America: New Regional
Research From BRIDE’s Magazine,” Business Wire, February 27,
2002.

Number of states with laws against adultery: Turley, Jonathan, “Of
Lust and the Law,” The
Washington Post
, September 5, 2004.

Supreme Court invalidation of laws against interracial marriage: “Can
Marriage Be Saved?”The Nation, July 5, 2004; “Go Deeper: Race
Timeline,” PBS,
November 5, 2004.

Gay wedding market: “The Gay-Marriage Windfall: 16.8 Billion,”
Forbes.com, April 5, 2004.

Marriage in Disneyworld: Kingston, Anne, The Meaning of Wife, New
York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2004.

Pre-nups and Catherine Zeta-Jones wedding: Grossberg, Josh,
“Catherine & Michael’s Mini-Judgement,” E!
Online
,November 7, 2003.
; “Prenups for Ordinary People,” The Week, July 16, 2004, p. 36; “Zeta-Jones Wins Hello! Damages,” November 7, 2003,
CNN.com; “Love and Marriage, Celebrity-Style,” USA
Today
, December 29, 2000
; McVeigh, Karen, “Couple ‘Touted’ Rights to Wedding,” The
Scotsman
, February 15, 2003; Valhouli, Christina, “Big Stars,
Big Weddings Bring Bigger Bucks,” Forbes.com,
October 19, 2004
; Reiter, Amy, “Zeta-Jones Rolls the Dice,” Salon, December 6, 2000.

Pre-nups, 2nd weddings, and Liza Minelli: Burwell, Marite, “Celebrity
Wedding Trends,” Weddings,
November 5, 2004; “Liza Minnelli, Husband Separate After 16 Months,”
AFP,
July 29, 2003.

Cost of wedding and investment in college education:
Allstate
Investment Basics

Reality wedding TV shows:
;
www.realitytvlinks.com

Percentage of Americans “happily married”: Vogt, Ryan, “Laura Kipnis:
The Chronicle Interview,” Northwestern
Chronicle
, October 24, 2003.

De Beers: Werthheimer, Linda and Siegal, Robert, “Critics Believe De Beers
Manipulates The Market to Keep Diamond Prices High,” NPR, All Things
Considered, November 27, 2001; Epstein, Edward Jay, “Have You Ever
Tried to Sell a Diamond?” Atlantic
Online
, February 1982; Dwyer, Dustin, “Diamond in the Rough:
Why the U.S. Should Let in De Beers,” Orlando Sentinel, March
15, 2004; Kaplan, Barry, “Forever
Diamonds”
; Payne, Melanie, ” ‘Right-hand’ Diamonds Marketed as
Power Sign,” Sacramento
Bee
, December 2, 2003; Pressler, Margaret Webb, “DeBeers
Pleads to Price-Fixing; Firm Pays $10 Million, Can Fully Reenter
U.S.,” The Washington Post, July 14, 2004.

Percentage of divorced people re-marrying: Hodder, Harbour Fraser,
“The Future of Marriage,” Harvard Magazine, November/December
2004, p.42

J-Lo:
Chalmers, Katie, “On Top of Her Game; Jenny’s Come a Long Way, Baby,”
Winnipeg Sun, June 29, 2003; “Selena Proposal,” Independent,
October 7, 2001; phone call to Ojani Noa; “Sean ‘Puffy’ Combs
Acquitted of Gun Possession and Bribery Charges,” Jet, April
2, 2001, p. 57; Patel, Shyama, “Rock Stars: Celebrity Rings,” New
York Metro
; “Lopez Announces Split from Affleck,” January 23,
2004, Associated
Press

; J.Lo
knockoff rings
; “Jennifer’s Big Surprise,” June 21, 2004,
People, p.68; “Around the Watercooler J-Lo Ties the Knot,”
June 7, 2004, Good Morning America (ABC news)transcript;
Miller, Marshall and Solot, Dorian, “Let Them Eat Wedding Rings: The
Role of Marriage Promotion in Welfare Reform,” 2002, Alternatives to
Marriage Project.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate