Tax jackpot!

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The New York Times reports today that states are relying increasingly on gambling revenue to fund their governments. Indeed, this has been the trend for some time, as states slash income and corporate taxes while making up their losses with “sin taxes” that fall largely on low-income families. It’s not hard to come up with reasons why depending on sin taxes are a bad idea—they provide an unreliable revenue base, for one—but most disturbingly, they tend to put state governments in the odd position of promoting activities like gambling and drinking. Just listen to Delaware Gov. Ruth Ann Minner: “We have legislators every day who propose opening new venues, like a big casino on the waterfront in Wilmington or a floating barge in the Delaware River.”

Interestingly enough, the “anti-tax” contingent in Washington—led by Grover Norquist, of course—doesn’t much object to all this Last summer, when Texas Gov. Rick Perry proposed to hike state sin taxes in exchange for a cut in property taxes, Norquist stayed quite silent on the matter. Some people, apparently, deserve to pay taxes more than others. More to the point, many conservatives have actually come to embrace regressive taxation over the years. Back in November 2002, the Wall Street Journal denounced America’s “lucky duckies”: those poverty-line taxpayers who pay no or minimal income tax. (Never mind that these workers still pay payroll, sales, and excise taxes; the Journal has no time for facts.) The only way to get these workers’ “blood boiling with tax rage,” and hence vote Republican, was to tax them more. So, on with the sin taxes.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate