Update on Obrador

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Yesterday, the Mexican Attorney General’s office was abuzz with talk about Mexico City Mayor Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador being able to head back to work despite his pending felony charges.

The AG’s office had originally filed felony charges against Obrador after stripping him of his immunity over a minor incident. (The backdrop here was that the popular Obrador was becoming an electoral threat to the ruling National Action Party; convicting him would make him ineligible to run for office.) Obrador would have had to serve jailtime, but two members of the ruling PAN posted Obrador’s bail against his wishes. Leaving Obrador in jail, they feared, would turn him into a martyr and might lead to increased popular demands that he be able to run in the 2006 elections. As it is, this past weekend an estimated 1.2 million people took part in the “March of Silence” in Mexico City to protest what they viewed as a cheap political ploy by the government.

The bail posting, oddly enough, ended up backfiring on the government. The presiding judge declared that the authorities had not followed the “correct procedure in setting the bail for the mayor,” and sent the case back to the Attorney General. The AG insisted he would re-file the charges against Obrador. But then the evening brought shocking news. President Fox announced that the Attorney General, Macedo de la Concha, had resigned, along with the Assistant Attorney General, who was overseeing the case against Obrador. President Fox then hinted that he may backpedal, noting that de la Concha’s replacement will “exhaustively review the case against the mayor, while seeking to preserve the greatest political harmony in the country.”

This all seems highly disingenuous. Not to mention that the sudden turnaround in the government’s stance towards Obrador affirms the notion that the movement against Obrador was just a political stunt to begin with. But I’m not complaining. If the charges against Obrador are dropped and he is allowed to run in the 2006 election, this will have been a great victory for the Mexicans who have pushed for democracy. But the government may also be buying some time, waiting until the public simmers down. It’s hard to believe that Fox’s party teamed up with the other majority party PRI (Institutional Revolutionary Party), pushed things this far, and are now simply backing down. It seems likely that we’ll see some more clever pre-campaign strategies to keep Obrador out of office, especially since there has been hardly a peep from their democracy-spreading neighbors to the north.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate