Open Road, Clear Conscience

Traveling light: tips for leaving the gringo guilt at home when you’re on holiday

Illustration: Christoph Hitz

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


A few years ago, a taxi driver and travel writer named Brad Newsham decided he was fed up with unethical travel, with the voyeuristic haves traipsing through the world of have-nots, leaving nothing behind but a few measly dollars. “I got to a point,” Newsham says, “where I realized, ‘Okay, in my 20s I was having grand adventures. But now I’m an adult, asking, What is my responsibility?’ I think it is almost unethical to go places and take experiences and not give something back.” Newsham envisioned a new kind of travel. He raised $26,000 in donations and formed a “Backpack Nation” of travelers to fan out and distribute the money to people who needed it. His goal was “to transform the West’s 2 to 3 million independent travelers into an army of global ambassadors, emissaries of peace, a roving force for good, and thereby help to save our world.”

I first read about Newsham’s ethical travel venture while I was slogging through the Malaysian province of Sarawak, itself a corrupt, overlogged, native-crushing, ecotouring, ethical minefield. I empathized with his effort to wrestle the issues we all face when we step on a plane and out into the world: How do we travel ethically? How do we know if we’re doing any harm? The tension between visitor and visited has existed since the first pleasure voyage, and there are many modern twists: Are we destroying the coral reefs, ancient ruins, and natural wonders in the rush to see them? Are we supporting corrupt regimes by spending our money? Does the massive global warming effect of airline travel outweigh even the greenest ecotour? And is it even ethical to travel at all, or would the world be a better place if we all just stayed home?

These questions have become more urgent, given the scale of modern travel. Last year more than 800 million tourists traveled internationally, and in 2004 tourism generated $623 billion, making it one of the largest industries in the world. Yet somehow that rising tide has not lifted all the boats (except, perhaps, cruise liners), and a growing number of travelers are asking questions like Newsham’s and looking to such movements as pro-poor tourism, fair trade tourism, and ethical travel for answers.

Travel writer Jeff Greenwald founded EthicalTraveler.com in an effort to provide some of those answers, such as a list of the most ethical destinations, and tips for being an ethical traveler no matter where you go: Bargain fairly, learn to listen, be open to the people you meet, and watch where your money goes. “People are going to travel. Their money is going to have an impact on these countries. Whether it’s a positive impact or an impact that helps feed a despotic regime like in Burma is up to the traveler,” says Greenwald. “I’m very much in favor of individual travelers going to Burma as long as they watch carefully where their money is going, speak to people, are aware of the situation there, and share that intelligence when they return home.”

Watching where your money goes is a core issue for Tricia Barnett, director of Tourism Concern, a U.K.-based organization that has been working to establish ethical travel standards since 1989. “What we discovered very quickly after Tourism Concern was set up,” says Barnett, “was how very little of the money that is spent when you go on holiday actually goes into local pockets.” This is especially true of all-inclusive resorts and cruise ships, which soak up money like giant sponges. To counter this, Tourism Concern has published The Ethical Travel Guide to help you travel globally and spend locally. But the ethical travel market is still small, and most of the time you’ll be on your own trying to work out the ethics of your trip. “You can’t micromanage every country you’re visiting,” says Greenwald. “But you can let the leadership and the tourism authorities know what your priorities are, and let them know you have a choice where you’re going to go.”

To do this, however, you need to educate yourself about the places you’re going to visit or avoid. “What ethical travel really means is being conscious of the people and the environmental conditions at a destination,” says David Fennell, a professor in the department of recreation and leisure studies at Brock University, “and not to put yourself above people at that destination.”

For Newsham, that meant giving something back: cash. What you give back, or how you give back, or even if you give anything back at all, will depend on your own ethics and your understanding of the world. For Newsham and Greenwald, projects like Backpack Nation spread good will and opportunity by helping people build toilets, buy farm animals, and fund small organizations. Others are more skeptical of travel philanthropy. “When you have well-meaning Americans showing up in some village with a few hundred dollars,” says Sustainable Tourism author David Weaver, “there will be no shortage of opportunists trying to get ahold of it for their own personal benefit. Unless it’s mediated by a very good organization, it’s almost definite that the money will be misused.”

Traveling ethically may soon become easier if good certification schemes for sustainable travel such as Green Globe 21 become more common. But until then, travel with your eyes open. “Ethical travel can be summed up in one word,” says Greenwald. “Awareness.” Educate yourself before takeoff and keep your mind open upon landing—and have fun. “The ethical trip is the trip where money goes back into the local environment and helps people really come out of poverty,” says Tourism Concern’s Barnett. “The enjoyable ethical trip is where you also have fun and learn lots and relax and do whatever gives you a good holiday.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate