Gimme Shelter

How to hold on to your hard-earned millions

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Say you’re the CEO of a company whose bookkeeping involves a bit of creative flair. You’ve watched Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling go down; you wonder, naturally, what happens if your outfit turns out to be the next Enron. How do you keep the creditors, the IRS, and the retirees away from your hard-earned millions? Consult an asset-protection attorney, that’s how; even in the wake of anti-corporate abuse legislation such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and last year’s bankruptcy reform, the law is full of loopholes. Remember, paying up is for suckers.

Buy a castle. Texas and Florida laws prevent creditors from seizing your homestead, no matter how opulent. Follow the lead of Kevin Hannon, former COO of Enron Broadband Services, and move into a $1.3 million six-bedroom-and-pool spread. Or perhaps you’ll aim for a two-acre, $3.1 million estate like the one belonging to Enron’s president, Lawrence G. Whalley. Both men may well keep their mansions despite a raft of civil lawsuits alleging that they essentially absconded with shareholders’ and retirees’ money. But their ex-boss, Jeff Skilling, could lose his $5.1 million home—following the former Enron CEO’s felony conviction, the feds have moved to confiscate his estate.

Collect Bibles. The Good Book is protected from creditors in some states, as are two guns, 120 chickens, one fishing boat, and an unspecified number of church pews. Jay Adkisson, an asset-protection attorney and the author of a book on the subject, says he knows of an Illinois debtor who in the late ’90s purchased a Gutenberg Bible worth some $10 million. (He won’t name the man for fear of tipping off creditors.) “Every state has little quirks like that,” Adkisson says, “and they go back to whatever the Legislature thought people needed to survive with” in the 1800s.

Set up a tropical trust. Eight U.S. states and at least 12 offshore money havens allow the creation of “self-settled” asset-protection trusts that place finances in the hands of a third party. No reliable figures exist on these trusts, though their total volume has been estimated at more than $1 trillion. Offshoring your loot is not foolproof: Stephan Jay Lawrence, a Chicago stockbroker, squirreled away $7 million in a Mauritius trust shortly before he lost a $20 million arbitration battle with an investment firm. He’s been in jail for seven years for failing to repatriate the money. Closer to home, investors may shelter their millions in states such as Delaware, but last year’s bankruptcy reform laws made such trusts more vulnerable.

Be your own boss. Can’t get a job? Set up a foundation and appoint yourself president. Lou L. Pai, the former CEO of Enron Energy Services who faces 21 lawsuits in connection with his well-timed sales of Enron stock, is the president of the Pai Foundation. Kenneth D. Rice—a former CEO of Enron Broadband Services who will be sentenced for securities fraud in December—is president of the Ken and Teresa Rice Foundation. Neither Pai nor Rice currently draws a salary, but if they did, irate investors still couldn’t get a penny: Texas, like Pennsylvania and South Carolina, doesn’t allow creditors to garnish wages.

Stash a nest egg. Shortly before Enron’s collapse, as Mother Jones reported in 2002, Ken Lay established an annuity worth more than $4 million; prosecutors didn’t touch it in the wake of Lay’s felony conviction, though they have moved to seize Lay’s $1.5 million condo and his $6.3 million hedge fund share. Such assets do become vulnerable when their owners are convicted of a felony, which is why Texas asset-planning expert Duncan Osborne is perplexed that the feds ignored Lay’s annuity: “I think they should have gone after that one.”

Die. By expiring after his conviction, but before his sentencing, Lay accomplished the seemingly impossible—voiding his conviction and pulling his assets from the feds’ clutches. Many legal experts say his wife is likely to inherit millions. “Death is a very powerful asset-protection tool,” says Adkisson. But, he adds, “I don’t frequently advise my clients to do it as part of a plan.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate