Boom Time In Beirut

Who profits when we sell arms to Israel?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


 [See a PDF of this chart]

IT’S WELL KNOWN that Israel is the world’s top recipient of U.S. military assistance, but not so often noted that most of the annual $3 billion in aid can be spent only on U.S.-made weapons. Below, a guide to the top industry beneficiaries along with their ethics records.

 

 

COMPANY

WEAPONS SYSTEMS

UNIT COST, NUMBER IN ISRAELI ARSENAL

2005 LOBBYING EXPENDITURES

NUMBER OF LEGAL SETTLEMENTS OR FINES, TOTAL PAID*

THE DIRT

 

Lockheed Martin

F-16 fighter planes

$40 million
279

$8,399,600

84
$365,534,245

Two years ago, when Lockheed was considering buying Titan Corp.—the contractor whose employees were implicated in the Abu Ghraib scandal—a vice president told investors the torture allegations “were not significant to our strategic decision.”

Destroyer mobile rocket launchers

$4.17 million
48

Hellfire missiles

$100,000-$150,000
n/a

Multiple-Launch Rocket Systems

$20.5 million
85

Raytheon

AIM-120 advanced medium-range air-to-air missiles

$620,000
n/a

$4,903,892

31
$156,576,914

This year, CEO William Swanson was busted for cribbing most of his best-selling booklet, Swanson’s Unwritten Rules of Management, from a 1944 book on engineering, as well as from the writings of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. Raytheon’s board responded by freezing Swanson’s salary at a mere $1.12 million (while leaving his $2.6 million bonus untouched).

Maverick air-to-surface missiles

$200,000
n/a

Sidewinder heat-seeking air-to-air missiles

$211,290
n/a

GBU-28 5,000-pound bunker-buster bombs

$300,000
100

United Technologies

Black Hawk helicopters

$12.3 million
48

$3,786,212

23
$240,287,702

In the late ’90s, United Technologies settled charges that it had conspired to divert $10 million in U.S. military aid into a slush fund subject to the exclusive control of an Israeli air force officer.

Boeing

AH-64 Apache helicopters

$15.3 million
44

$9,240,000

50
$360,441,913

In 2002, Air Force procurement official Darleen Druyun negotiated a deal with Boeing to lease tanker planes for $23.5 billion—$6 billion more than the Congressional Budget Office found they should have cost—while she was in secret job talks with the company. Druyun and Boeing CFO Michael Sears were sent to prison, and CEO Phil Condit was forced to resign.

F-15 fighter planes

$38 million
93

Joint Direct Attack Munitions (“smart bomb” kits)

$27,500
n/a

Textron

AH-1 Cobra attack helicopter

$10.7 million
83

$3,860,000

21
$25,564,166

In an early test of Textron and Boeing’s vastly over-budget and behind-schedule V-22 Osprey, the $100 million tilt-rotor plane plunged into the Potomac in front of a crowd of congressmen and killed seven people. Two more crashes in 2000 killed 23. 

General Dynamics

M-60A3 tanks

$743,000
1,040

$3,027,648

8
$73,400,894

During the 1980s, a series of government investigations revealed massive overbilling, such as $9,609 for a 12-cent hexagon wrench; at one point the company charged the government for a $571 mattress delivered to a hotel for a “very large” executive.

Additional research by Carl Gutierrez, Eric Hundman, and Jennifer Wedekind.                     *1991-2006

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate