The Diddly Awards

THE GEORGE ALLEN (SR.) AWARD FOR THE MIDTERM ELECTION’S MOST DESPERATE HAIL-MARY PASS

Illustration by: Peter Hoey

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


NOMINEE 1
Raj Peter Bhakta (gop House candidate-Pa.) won D-list fame as a contestant
on The Apprentice. But even The Donald never showed the chutzpah Bhakta displayed
when, to demonstrate how easy it is for immigrants to cross the border, he attempted
to ride an elephant—followed by two other elephants and a six-piece mariachi
band—across the Rio Grande in Texas. (Bhakta lost.)

NOMINEE 2
Michael Steele (gop Senate candidate-Md.) ran an ad of himself hugging
a Boston terrier and warning that his opponent would claim, “Steele hates puppies—and
worse.” The response ad came quickly: “Michael Steele: He likes puppies, but
he loves George Bush.” Then, on Election Day, gop operatives paid six busloads
of destitute men to stand in front of voting stations in largely black precincts
and hand out flyers falsely claiming Steele was a Democrat. (Steele lost.)

NOMINEE 3
Claire McCaskill (Democratic Senate candidate-Mo.) bought 100 Rams tickets
when she learned that a St. Louis TV station would not broadcast the season
opener unless it sold out. She gave the football tickets to charity, and the
media unleashed story after story proclaiming her good will and brilliant campaign
instincts. (McCaskill won.)

NOMINEE 4
Senator Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) made a last-ditch appeal to those influential
voters, Lord of the Rings nerds. Santorum explained to a local editorial board:
“As the hobbits are going up Mount Doom, the Eye of Mordor is being drawn somewhere
else. It’s being drawn to Iraq.” We have no idea what it means either, but we
suspect it has something to do with man-on-dog sex. (Farewell Santorum. Diddly
will be lost without you.)

WINNER!
Raj Peter Bhakta
, whose Hannibal stunt failed to make the splash he was
hoping for. “The elephant never made landfall into Mexico,” Bhakta explained.
“He could have made 15 laps back and forth, but no one showed up.” Except for
agents from the USDA, who detained the elephants and sprayed them for ticks.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate