Reaction to the President’s Second to Last State of the Union Address

A lame duck president makes his plea. What did Washington think?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Directly after a State of the Union that left observers ranging from the fawning
(“A Force,” drooled National
Review
) to the enraged (“LAME,” screamed Slate’s homepage. “Tepid,” complained its article),
lawmakers and Washington insiders mingled with their colleagues and the press.
Mother Jones sought some out for their thoughts. For example, Democratic Congressman
Rahm Emanuel (above) of Illinois’ 5th District spoke to Mother Jones after appearing in
front of cameras that were situated along the edge of Statuary Hall. Of the president’s health care plan, Emanuel said, “I think it leaves
in place a broken tax code and a failed healthcare system. Outside of that,
it’s really got a lot of merit.” The congressman’s prediction: “[A vote] won’t even
come up.”

Senator Maria Cantwell of Washington State took a few moments between phone
calls to speak with Mother Jones. To her, the highlight of the State
of the Union was Nancy Pelosi, the first female Speaker of the House, sitting
next to Vice President Dick Cheney. The juxtaposition “paints a picture for America of what’s
been the past and what is the future. To me was very exciting. I was so glad
that the President stopped at the beginning [to congratulate Pelosi and Democrats].”
Her low? “[Bush] mentions diplomacy in his State of the Union about
the U.N. and others, but to me, you can’t just be for the long hard slog of
deployment, you have to be there for the long hard slog of diplomacy, too.”

Bruce Gordon, President and CEO of the NAACP was disappointed with the speech.
“The nation is not attentive to the issue of poverty. They are not dealing with
the fact that too many of their fellow Americans are living below the poverty
line, and in fact, most Americans don’t even know where the poverty line is.
One-third of Black and Hispanic Americans are living at a level that is not
liveable.”

From Left to Right: Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas, Hilary Shelton of the NAACP’s Washington
office, and Bruce Gordon. Gordon said of Bush’s
healthcare plan, “If you can’t afford to buy healthcare insurance, then you
can’t write it off. I think that for too many people it just was not a solution
that’s viable.”

Senator Joe Biden (D) of Delaware was the only presidential hopeful who stopped
in to talk with press in Statuary Hall. He was also one of the more obvious
active listeners in the audience during the State of the Union address. He was
the first to stand during the standing ovations for the president’s mention of
“the serious challenge of global climate change” and the situation in Darfur.

Congressman Jason Altmire (D) of Pennsylvania’s 4th District stopped to share
some of his shock with Mother Jones before continuing to work the room.
“He’s submitted to Congress six consecutive budget deficits, he’s going to introduce
an unbalanced budget in a couple of weeks, he’s run up one of the biggest deficits
we’ve ever had, so I’m a little bit surprised to have him come in and lecture
the Congress about deficit spending and fiscal responsibility.”

Congressman Ed Perlmutter (D) of Colorado’s 7th was supportive of the President…
to a point. “On energy, that was something where I really felt like even though
I would want him to go farther, at least he’s starting to head in the right
direction. And as a Democrat, when the guy’s starting in the right direction,
I’m gonna help him keep going that direction. [However,] I don’t like where
he’s headed on Iraq, I think it’s more of the same, and I’m gonna resist that.”

Congressman David Wu (D) of Oregon’s 1st District called the president’s healthcare
plan “fatally flawed.” He was, however, beaming with pride about his own healthcare
idea. “The proposal I’ve been working on for a good while now we call MediKids.
Which is to give universal coverage like what Medicare does for seniors for
kids from pregnancy to age 18.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate