March/April 2007 Issue

The Diddly Awards

The Ali vs. Foreman memorial award for best political beef

Illustration by: Tom Bachtell

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


NOMINEE 1
Howard Dean vs. James Carville
After Dean refused to pour $6 million into tight midterm races in favor of long-term party building, Cajun Clintonite James Carville, acting as a proxy for Dean nemesis Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), denounced Dean’s leadership as “Rumsfeldian in its competence.” Returning fire, Dean dissed Carville as part of “the old Democratic Party.” Added Dean’s online muscle, Daily Kos’ Markos Moulitsas, “Carville needs to shut the fuck up.”

NOMINEE 2
Karl Rove vs. Rep. Steve Kagen
Freshman Democrat Kagen blamed Rove, who came to Wisconsin to campaign against him, for turning his race into a “knife fight” that cost him $2 million of his fortune. So it was with Soprano-like gusto that Kagen took his revenge, claiming that he cornered Rove in a White House john, crowing, “You recognize me? My name’s Dr. Multimillionaire, and I kicked your ass.”

NOMINEE 3
Rep. Keith Ellison vs. Rep. Virgil Goode
When Ellison (D-Minn.), the first Muslim member of Congress, announced his intention to be sworn in using a Koran, Goode (R-Va.) didn’t stop at bad before he hit ugly. “I do not subscribe to using the Koran in any way,” Goode seethed in a letter, menacing that thanks to immigration, “there will likely be many more Muslims elected to office and demanding the use of the Koran.”

NOMINEE 4
Maverick McCain vs. Kiss-Ass
McCain
In 2000, Maverick McCain (R-Ariz.) ran for president defending abortion rights and calling Jerry Falwell an “agent of intolerance.” Kiss-Ass McCain kick-started his ’08 campaign pledging to repeal Roe v. Wade, and hired Falwell’s debate squad coach to help beat Maverick McCain into submission. With mixed results: “I think the fence is least effective” as a border policy, Maverick said, before Kiss-Ass kicked in with a sop to the base: “But I’ll build the goddamned fence if they want it.”

WINNER! Ellison vs. Goode.
Ellison, a native of the teeming border town of Detroit, goaded Goode by swearing the oath of office on a Koran belonging to a far nobler Virginian: Thomas Jefferson.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate